From: "Jingoo Han" <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
To: "'Joao Pinto'" <Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com>,
"'Carlos Palminha'" <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>,
<linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <bhelgaas@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 15:34:48 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000c01d2ff33$c1202510$43606f30$@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <18cf8549-c1c6-bed2-60f2-202abc06d6b3@synopsys.com>
On Monday, July 17, 2017 9:28 AM, Joao Pinto wrote:
>
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Às 2:13 PM de 7/17/2017, Carlos Palminha escreveu:
> > Helper functions dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll don't need to be in global
> scope,
> > so make it static.
> >
> > Cleans up sparse warnings:
> > - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
> > - symbol 'dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll' was not declared. Should it
> be static?
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Carlos Palminha <palminha@synopsys.com>
> > ---
> > Patch made against linux-next tree, tag next-20170714
> >
> > drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-
> designware.c
> > index 0e03af279259..48d6d0712ea8 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ob_unroll(struct dw_pcie
> *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> > }
> >
> > -void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index,
> int type,
> > +static void dw_pcie_prog_outbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int
> index, int type,
> > u64 cpu_addr, u64 pci_addr, u32 size)
> > {
> > u32 retries, val;
> > @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ static void dw_pcie_writel_ib_unroll(struct dw_pcie
> *pci, u32 index, u32 reg,
> > dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + reg, val);
> > }
> >
> > -int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int index, int
> bar,
> > +static int dw_pcie_prog_inbound_atu_unroll(struct dw_pcie *pci, int
> index, int bar,
> > u64 cpu_addr, enum dw_pcie_as_type as_type)
> > {
> > int type;
> > --
> > 2.11.0
> >
>
> That indeed escaped in the refactoring :) Thanks!
>
> Acked-by: Joao Pinto <jpinto@synopsys.com>
Acked-by: Jingoo Han <jingoohan1@gmail.com>
Best regards,
Jingoo Han
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-17 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-17 13:13 [PATCH] PCI: dwc: designware: make dw_pcie_prog_*_atu_unroll() static Carlos Palminha
2017-07-17 13:27 ` Joao Pinto
2017-07-17 19:34 ` Jingoo Han [this message]
2017-08-02 21:50 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2017-08-03 8:51 ` Carlos Palminha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000c01d2ff33$c1202510$43606f30$@gmail.com' \
--to=jingoohan1@gmail.com \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox