public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Eric Barton" <eric@bartonsoftware.com>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: tcp_recvmsg() in 2.4.4
Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 18:59:06 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <000e01c0ef7b$8b3a8d20$0281a8c0@ebpc> (raw)


If there are no packets on sk->recieve_queue, and nothing has been copied
to userland yet, it seems to me there is a redundant test of sk->done.

About line 1461 in net/ipv4/tcp.c:

		/* Well, if we have backlog, try to process it now yet. */

		if (copied >= target && sk->backlog.tail == NULL)
			break;

		if (copied) {
			if (sk->err ||
			    sk->state == TCP_CLOSE ||
			    (sk->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) ||
			    !timeo ||
			    (flags & MSG_PEEK))
				break;
		} else {
			if (sk->done)
				break;

			if (sk->err) {
				copied = sock_error(sk);
				break;
			}

			if (sk->shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
				break;

			if (sk->state == TCP_CLOSE) {
				if (!sk->done) {
					/* This occurs when user tries to read
					 * from never connected socket.
					 */
					copied = -ENOTCONN;
					break;
				}
				break;
			}

			if (!timeo) {
				copied = -EAGAIN;
				break;
			}
		}

When it get to if(sk->state == TCP_CLOSE), surely sk->done has already been
tested (and the socket is locked), so -ENOTCONN could be returned
immediately.

Actually I'd really appreciate it if someone could explain the order of
tests for sk->done, sk->err, sk->shutdown and sk->state...

--

                Cheers,
                        Eric

----------------------------------------------------
|Eric Barton        Barton Software                |
|9 York Gardens     Tel:    +44 (117) 923 9831     |
|Clifton            Mobile: +44 (7909) 680 356     |
|Bristol BS8 4LL    Fax:    call first             |
|United Kingdom     E-Mail: eric@bartonsoftware.com|
----------------------------------------------------


             reply	other threads:[~2001-06-08 14:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-06-07 17:59 Eric Barton [this message]
2001-06-08 15:29 ` tcp_recvmsg() in 2.4.4 David S. Miller
2001-06-08 17:08   ` Alan Cox
2001-06-25  4:43 ` Is SIOCGIFCOUNT implemented under 2.4.0 Nagendra Singh Tomar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='000e01c0ef7b$8b3a8d20$0281a8c0@ebpc' \
    --to=eric@bartonsoftware.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox