* request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?
@ 2000-10-30 21:45 Mirko Klemm
2000-10-30 22:38 ` Marko Kreen
2000-10-31 2:51 ` Jeff Dike
0 siblings, 2 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mirko Klemm @ 2000-10-30 21:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
Could anyone please send me a comment on how actually usable the devfs
support in the 2.4.0 test series is at the moment?
I am currently using 2.4.0-test* as an "ordinary user" and want to try some
of the 2.4 specific new features out, but this is my only system and I don't
want it to be messed up so much, so I'd like to hear some comments first.
Which version of devfsd/utils is needed?
Thanks,
Mirko
--
Mirko Klemm
Mirko.Klemm@t-online.de
GPG-Public Key at:
http://www.mutantenzoo.de/kmirko.asc
encrypted messages preferred
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?
2000-10-30 21:45 request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9? Mirko Klemm
@ 2000-10-30 22:38 ` Marko Kreen
2000-10-31 2:51 ` Jeff Dike
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Marko Kreen @ 2000-10-30 22:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mirko Klemm; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Mon, Oct 30, 2000 at 10:45:48PM +0100, Mirko Klemm wrote:
> Could anyone please send me a comment on how actually usable the devfs
> support in the 2.4.0 test series is at the moment?
Fine. I was forced to use it from 2.3.99-something and
have not had any problems with it. (I lifted whole system
from one disk to another and forgot to create /dev :)
> I am currently using 2.4.0-test* as an "ordinary user" and want to try some
> of the 2.4 specific new features out, but this is my only system and I don't
> want it to be messed up so much, so I'd like to hear some comments first.
> Which version of devfsd/utils is needed?
I have devfsd 1.3.10.
You better be sure you have following lines in devfsd.conf:
REGISTER .* MKOLDCOMPAT
UNREGISTER .* RMOLDCOMPAT
You can later reconfigure most stuff to use new layout
but especially X is a pain.
--
marko
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9?
2000-10-30 21:45 request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9? Mirko Klemm
2000-10-30 22:38 ` Marko Kreen
@ 2000-10-31 2:51 ` Jeff Dike
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Dike @ 2000-10-31 2:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Mirko Klemm; +Cc: linux-kernel
Mirko.Klemm@t-online.de said:
> I am currently using 2.4.0-test* as an "ordinary user" and want to try
> some of the 2.4 specific new features out, but this is my only system
> and I don't want it to be messed up so much, so I'd like to hear some
> comments first.
This is one of the things that user-mode Linux (http://user-mode-linux.sourcefo
rge.net) is for. I've been shipping kernels with devfs since devfs made it
into the mainline pool.
With UML, you can boot up a virtual machine, and play with devfs all you want
without any chance of messing up the host.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-10-31 1:43 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-10-30 21:45 request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9? Mirko Klemm
2000-10-30 22:38 ` Marko Kreen
2000-10-31 2:51 ` Jeff Dike
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox