From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:46:41 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:46:22 -0500 Received: from mailout04.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.18]:26377 "EHLO mailout04.sul.t-online.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:46:13 -0500 From: Mirko.Klemm@t-online.de (Mirko Klemm) Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 22:45:48 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: request advice: how stable is devfs in 2.4.0-test9? MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <00103022454801.00908@trabant> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Could anyone please send me a comment on how actually usable the devfs support in the 2.4.0 test series is at the moment? I am currently using 2.4.0-test* as an "ordinary user" and want to try some of the 2.4 specific new features out, but this is my only system and I don't want it to be messed up so much, so I'd like to hear some comments first. Which version of devfsd/utils is needed? Thanks, Mirko -- Mirko Klemm Mirko.Klemm@t-online.de GPG-Public Key at: http://www.mutantenzoo.de/kmirko.asc encrypted messages preferred - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/