public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kevin@labsysgrp.com>
To: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: 2.4.9-ac1/2/3 allows multiple mounts of NFS filesystem on same mountpoint
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 21:24:47 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <001301c131d4$de9180f0$6caaa8c0@kevin> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <000901c13179$be7b9ae0$6caaa8c0@kevin> <shsd75d2whg.fsf@charged.uio.no>

I was expecting it to be an error, but I'm not upset that it's not. Just
kind of weird to see five mounts with the exact same information in
/etc/mtab.

I can see why it would be useful to have multiple things mounted on the same
mountpoint, but is there any reason to allow the _same_ filesystem to be
mounted multiple times at the same mountpoint?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kevin@labsysgrp.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Thursday, August 30, 2001 12:12 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.9-ac1/2/3 allows multiple mounts of NFS filesystem on same
mountpoint


> >>>>> " " == Kevin P Fleming <kevin@labsysgrp.com> writes:
>
>      > Accidentally <G> I mounted a filesystem from my server onto my
>      > workstation twice. Mount gave me no error....
>
> That's right. The 2.4 VFS removed the global restriction on the number
> of mounts on a single mountpoint. So?
>
> If people expect this to be an error, then the correct thing is for
> the VFS restriction to be reinstated. I see no reason why it should be
> the responsibility of the filesystem to check for this sort of
> thing. A mountpoint is after all the one place where the VFS is
> actually *designed* to override the filesystem.
>
> Cheers,
>   Trond
>
>
>


  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-08-31  4:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-30 17:32 2.4.9-ac1/2/3 allows multiple mounts of NFS filesystem on same mountpoint Kevin P. Fleming
2001-08-30 19:12 ` Trond Myklebust
2001-08-31  1:23   ` Thiago Vinhas de Moraes
2001-08-31 14:03     ` Pascal Schmidt
2001-08-31  4:24   ` Kevin P. Fleming [this message]
2001-08-31  4:46     ` Alexander Viro

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='001301c131d4$de9180f0$6caaa8c0@kevin' \
    --to=kevin@labsysgrp.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox