From: "Manfred Spraul" <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "\"Richard B. Johnson\"" <root@chaos.analogic.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Behavior of poll() within a module
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2001 17:58:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001401c15bdb$85030e60$010411ac@local> (raw)
>
> The following actual module code:
>
> static unsigned int vxi_poll(struct file *fp, struct poll_table_struct *wait)
> {
> unsigned long flags;
> unsigned int mask;
> DEB(printk("vxi_poll\n"));
> info->poll_active++;
> poll_wait(fp, &info->wait, wait);
> spin_lock_irqsave(&vxi_lock, flags);
> mask = info->poll_mask;
> if(!--info->poll_active)
> info->poll_mask = 0;
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vxi_lock, flags);
> DEB(printk("vxi_poll returns\n"));
> return mask;
> }
Which module is that? I can't find it in Linus tree.
Is "info" a global variable?
* poll is called without any SMP locking, "info->poll_active++" is not SMP safe. Use atomic_inc, or even better just delete that
line.
* Clearing poll_mask during poll is wrong.
poll should return the events that are currently available, i.e. what would happen if read() or write() would be called now.
read() on a non-blocking file handle would return immediately with 1 or more bytes read --> set POLLIN
write() on a non-blocking file handle would return immediately with a nonzero byte count written--> set POLLOUT.
The clearing of poll_mask must occur during read() and write() if these conditions are not true anymore.
--
Manfred
next reply other threads:[~2001-10-23 15:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-23 15:58 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-10-23 17:17 ` Behavior of poll() within a module Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-23 18:02 ` Manfred Spraul
2001-10-23 18:16 ` Richard B. Johnson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-10-23 12:53 Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-23 13:33 ` Mike Jagdis
2001-10-23 14:13 ` Richard B. Johnson
2001-10-24 9:52 ` Mike Jagdis
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001401c15bdb$85030e60$010411ac@local' \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=root@chaos.analogic.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox