From: "Manfred Spraul" <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, "Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: changing mm->mmap_sem (was: Re: system call for process information?)
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:34:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001701c0af8e$bd590ac0$5517fea9@local> (raw)
>
> The problem is that mmap_sem seems to be protecting the list
> of VMAs, so taking _only_ the page_table_lock could let a VMA
> change under us while a page fault is underway ...
No, that can't happen.
VMA changes only happen if both the mmap_sem and the page table lock is
acquired. (check insert_vm() at the end of mm/mmap.c)
The page fault path uses the map_sem, kswaps uses page_table_lock.
<< from your patch:
--- linux-2.4.2-ac20-vm/mm/vmscan.c.orig Sat Mar 17 11:30:49 2001
+++ linux-2.4.2-ac20-vm/mm/vmscan.c Sat Mar 17 20:53:10 2001
@@ -231,6 +231,7 @@
* Find the proper vm-area after freezing the vma chain
* and ptes.
*/
+ down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
spin_lock(&mm->page_table_lock);
>>>>
Why do you acquire the mmap semaphore in swapout_mm()? The old rule was
that kswapd should never sleep on the mmap semaphore. Isn't there a
deadlock if mmap sem is already acquired? I don't remember the details.
>
> The problem is that mmap_sem seems to be protecting the list
> of VMAs, so taking _only_ the page_table_lock could let a VMA
> change under us while a page fault is underway ...
I remember that the pmd_alloc() and pte_alloc() functions need
additional locking.
--
Manfred
next reply other threads:[~2001-03-18 9:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-18 9:34 Manfred Spraul [this message]
2001-03-18 10:56 ` changing mm->mmap_sem (was: Re: system call for process information?) Rik van Riel
2001-03-19 12:54 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
[not found] <200103181813.KAA22153@penguin.transmeta.com>
2001-03-18 20:59 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-19 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-03-19 2:59 ` Rik van Riel
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.33.0103181407520.1426-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
2001-03-18 14:43 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-18 18:13 ` Linus Torvalds
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-14 19:19 system call for process information? Rik van Riel
2001-03-15 12:24 ` changing mm->mmap_sem (was: Re: system call for process information?) Rik van Riel
2001-03-16 9:49 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-03-16 11:50 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-16 12:53 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-03-18 7:23 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-18 9:56 ` Mike Galbraith
2001-03-18 10:46 ` Rik van Riel
2001-03-18 12:33 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001701c0af8e$bd590ac0$5517fea9@local' \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox