From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754672AbbAFJ2i (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 04:28:38 -0500 Received: from smtp1.hiworks.co.kr ([121.254.168.204]:49464 "EHLO smtp1.hiworks.co.kr" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754620AbbAFJ2g (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jan 2015 04:28:36 -0500 X-Greylist: delayed 399 seconds by postgrey-1.27 at vger.kernel.org; Tue, 06 Jan 2015 04:28:35 EST From: "kyhw" To: "'Jiri Kosina'" Cc: , , References: <006101cf4812$c3ac1680$4b044380$@afoi.co.kr> <003a01cf488c$ab9c4400$02d4cc00$@afoi.co.kr> In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO., LTD. Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2015 18:21:57 +0900 Message-ID: <001701d02992$37f595f0$a7e0c1d0$@co.kr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AQHgmKd00nK6Cd07QSZGmulK6nUVggGjAdY6AfVuB5sCGKpo2ZxkYYBw Content-Language: ko Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks. you are right. That's not necessary. We already processed. The final purpose of my approach is that the correct working of the AFO multi-Touch module in All distribution of Linux. Therefore, the inclusion of the VID,PID(AFO Touch Module) to the hid-multitouch module is basically needed also for old version of the Linux distribution. Ki. -----Original Message----- From: Jiri Kosina [mailto:jkosina@suse.cz] Sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2014 11:44 PM To: YongHwan Ki Cc: rydberg@euromail.se; linux-input@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: RE: [PATCH] Add VID/PID for HID-type Multi-Touch Module of AFO CO., LTD. On Wed, 26 Mar 2014, YongHwan Ki wrote: > Sorry, I woud like to add the AFO defines in the Linux Kernel. > No afo defines exists in the current kernel tree. > I correctly changed the log for adding the afo defines. > > Kernel Version : linux-3.14.rc7 > Signed-off-by: Yonghwan Ki > > diff -uprN -X Documentation/dontdiff ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c ../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c > --- ./drivers/hid/hid-core.c 2014-03-17 10:51:24.000000000 +0900 > +++ ../linux-3.14-rc7m/drivers/hid/hid-core.c 2014-03-21 17:41:51.846939444 +0900 > @@ -1881,6 +1881,8 @@ static const struct hid_device_id hid_ha > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0005) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZEROPLUS, 0x0030) }, > { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_ZYDACRON, > USB_DEVICE_ID_ZYDACRON_REMOTE_CONTROL) }, > + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_TCM) }, > + { HID_USB_DEVICE(USB_VENDOR_ID_AFO, USB_DEVICE_ID_AFO_THM) }, Is this really necessary? Why doesn't HID_DG_CONTACTID matching work for the to automatically trigger HID_GROUP_MULTITOUCH-based binding? -- Jiri Kosina SUSE Labs