public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems
@ 2001-02-07  2:56 jeff covey
  2001-02-07  4:11 ` Ray Strode
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: jeff covey @ 2001-02-07  2:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 466 bytes --]

We'd like to run an editorial this coming Saturday about the
journaling filesystems available for Linux.  We'd like an author who
isn't a developer on any of them so he/she can give an object analysis
of the pros and cons of each and share thoughts on his/her opinions
about which should be eventually be supported by the kernel.

If you would like to do this or have a recommendation of someone who
would be good for it, please let me know privately.

Thanks,
Jeff

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 232 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems
  2001-02-07  2:56 freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems jeff covey
@ 2001-02-07  4:11 ` Ray Strode
  2001-02-07 13:18   ` James Sutherland
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ray Strode @ 2001-02-07  4:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-kernel; +Cc: jeff covey

>We'd like to run an editorial this coming Saturday about the
>journaling filesystems available for Linux.  We'd like an author who
>isn't a developer on any of them so he/she can give an object analysis
>of the pros and cons of each and share thoughts on his/her opinions
>about which should be eventually be supported by the kernel.
I disagree.  I think you should ask someone who works on more than 
one of the filesystems.  That person will know the pros and cons of all
of them, and surely will be objective.

--Ray Strode

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems
  2001-02-07  4:11 ` Ray Strode
@ 2001-02-07 13:18   ` James Sutherland
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: James Sutherland @ 2001-02-07 13:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Ray Strode; +Cc: linux-kernel, jeff covey

On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, Ray Strode wrote:

> >We'd like to run an editorial this coming Saturday about the
> >journaling filesystems available for Linux.  We'd like an author who
> >isn't a developer on any of them so he/she can give an object analysis
> >of the pros and cons of each and share thoughts on his/her opinions
> >about which should be eventually be supported by the kernel.
> I disagree.  I think you should ask someone who works on more than 
> one of the filesystems.  That person will know the pros and cons of all
> of them, and surely will be objective.

Either that, or have a developer from each talking about their own FS, and
how they think it compares to others. Then an impartial summary of what
each has said.


James.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2001-02-07 13:18 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2001-02-07  2:56 freshmeat editorial on journaling filesystems jeff covey
2001-02-07  4:11 ` Ray Strode
2001-02-07 13:18   ` James Sutherland

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox