RE: [PATCH v9 06/13] exfat: add exfat entry operations

["Namjae Jeon" <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>]

> > +int exfat_ent_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc,
> > +		unsigned int *content)
> > +{
> > +	struct exfat_sb_info *sbi = EXFAT_SB(sb);
> > +	int err;
> > +
> > +	if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, loc)) {
> > +		exfat_fs_error(sb, "invalid access to FAT (entry 0x%08x)",
> > +			loc);
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	err = __exfat_ent_get(sb, loc, content);
> > +	if (err) {
> > +		exfat_fs_error(sb,
> > +			"failed to access to FAT (entry 0x%08x, err:%d)",
> > +			loc, err);
> > +		return err;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (!is_reserved_cluster(*content) &&
> > +			!is_valid_cluster(sbi, *content)) {
> > +		exfat_fs_error(sb,
> > +			"invalid access to FAT (entry 0x%08x) bogus content
> (0x%08x)",
> > +			loc, *content);
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (*content == EXFAT_FREE_CLUSTER) {
> > +		exfat_fs_error(sb,
> > +			"invalid access to FAT free cluster (entry 0x%08x)",
> > +			loc);
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (*content == EXFAT_BAD_CLUSTER) {
> > +		exfat_fs_error(sb,
> > +			"invalid access to FAT bad cluster (entry 0x%08x)",
> > +			loc);
> > +		return -EIO;
> > +	}
> > +	return 0;
> 
> Maybe these explicit checks should move up, and then is_reserved_cluster
> can be replaced with an explicit check just for EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER?
Right, Will fix it on v10.
> 
> Otherwise looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Thanks!