Reaiser fs

Reaiser fs

[bil Jeschke]

Ooops, i figured out what went wrong, but if I have to
enable the experimental drivers, of which Reiser is
not, then why is ext3 a choice when it is labeled
experimental and I did not enable the experimental drivers?

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com

Re: Reaiser fs

[Hans Reiser]

bil Jeschke wrote:

>Ooops, i figured out what went wrong, but if I have to
>enable the experimental drivers, of which Reiser is
>not, then why is ext3 a choice when it is labeled
>experimental and I did not enable the experimental drivers?
>
>__________________________________________________
>Do You Yahoo!?
>Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
>http://greetings.yahoo.com
>-
>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>
ReiserFS is not labelled experimental in the SuSE kernel nowadays...... 
  and I think SuSE is correct.  We still have bugs, you can read about 
them on our mailing list, but hitting them is much less likely than a 
drive failure for ReiserFS users on the whole.  2.4.17 looks like our 
most stable version yet.  Marcello does a really nice job of quickly 
integrating patches.

Hans

Re: Reaiser fs

[Juergen Sauer]

> ReiserFS is not labelled experimental in the SuSE kernel nowadays......
> and I think SuSE is correct.  We still have bugs, you can read about
> them on our mailing list, but hitting them is much less likely than a
> drive failure for ReiserFS users on the whole.  2.4.17 looks like our
> most stable version yet.  Marcello does a really nice job of quickly
> integrating patches.

Merry Christmas !

Is the NFS conjunction for reiserfs for Servers now usable stable ?
Means, no panic patches nessesary not patch-of-the-day anymore, just 
linux-like-rocks-steady-working ?

(In the past ther were to much headaches and patches ...)
Just asking before upgrading any server.

Have nice X-Mas...
	J. Sauer

-- 
Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@automatix.de **
** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-     **

Re: Reaiser fs

[Hans Reiser]

Juergen Sauer wrote:

>>ReiserFS is not labelled experimental in the SuSE kernel nowadays......
>>and I think SuSE is correct.  We still have bugs, you can read about
>>them on our mailing list, but hitting them is much less likely than a
>>drive failure for ReiserFS users on the whole.  2.4.17 looks like our
>>most stable version yet.  Marcello does a really nice job of quickly
>>integrating patches.
>>
>
>Merry Christmas !
>
>Is the NFS conjunction for reiserfs for Servers now usable stable ?
>Means, no panic patches nessesary not patch-of-the-day anymore, just 
>linux-like-rocks-steady-working ?
>
>(In the past ther were to much headaches and patches ...)
>Just asking before upgrading any server.
>
>Have nice X-Mas...
>	J. Sauer
>
I'm not getting any complaints about NFS plus reiserfs at this time..... 
anyone got one?:-)

Hans

Re: Reaiser fs

[Tommy Faasen]

It seems to work for me, but I am not doing any heavy load on it, just my
personal network..

Merry christams and all that!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Hans Reiser" <reiser@namesys.com>
To: "Juergen Sauer" <jojo@automatix.de>
Cc: "bil Jeschke" <theuteck@yahoo.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Monday, December 24, 2001 3:00 PM
Subject: Re: Reaiser fs


> Juergen Sauer wrote:
>
> >>ReiserFS is not labelled experimental in the SuSE kernel nowadays......
> >>and I think SuSE is correct.  We still have bugs, you can read about
> >>them on our mailing list, but hitting them is much less likely than a
> >>drive failure for ReiserFS users on the whole.  2.4.17 looks like our
> >>most stable version yet.  Marcello does a really nice job of quickly
> >>integrating patches.
> >>
> >
> >Merry Christmas !
> >
> >Is the NFS conjunction for reiserfs for Servers now usable stable ?
> >Means, no panic patches nessesary not patch-of-the-day anymore, just
> >linux-like-rocks-steady-working ?
> >
> >(In the past ther were to much headaches and patches ...)
> >Just asking before upgrading any server.
> >
> >Have nice X-Mas...
> > J. Sauer
> >
> I'm not getting any complaints about NFS plus reiserfs at this time.....
> anyone got one?:-)
>
> Hans
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: Reaiser fs

[Luigi Genoni]

I am using NFS to share /usr and /home with reiserFS on three dual Athlon
1500XP, and they have 1 month of uptime and no problems till now.
I am using kernel 2.4.13+mosix. I am also using a 2.4.17 NFS server with
reiserFS on a k6-II 475Mhz, for slackware installation with NFS, and no
problem also there. It happens that I have also very high IO on NFS, so I
think I can say it works.

Luigi

On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Juergen Sauer wrote:

> > ReiserFS is not labelled experimental in the SuSE kernel nowadays......
> > and I think SuSE is correct.  We still have bugs, you can read about
> > them on our mailing list, but hitting them is much less likely than a
> > drive failure for ReiserFS users on the whole.  2.4.17 looks like our
> > most stable version yet.  Marcello does a really nice job of quickly
> > integrating patches.
>
> Merry Christmas !
>
> Is the NFS conjunction for reiserfs for Servers now usable stable ?
> Means, no panic patches nessesary not patch-of-the-day anymore, just
> linux-like-rocks-steady-working ?
>
> (In the past ther were to much headaches and patches ...)
> Just asking before upgrading any server.
>
> Have nice X-Mas...
> 	J. Sauer
>
> --
> Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@automatix.de **
> ** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
> http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-     **
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>

Re: Reaiser fs

[Juergen Sauer]

Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2001 15:53 schrieb Luigi Genoni:
> I am using NFS to share /usr and /home with reiserFS on three dual
> Athlon 1500XP, and they have 1 month of uptime and no problems till
> now. I am using kernel 2.4.13+mosix. I am also using a 2.4.17 NFS
> server with reiserFS on a k6-II 475Mhz, for slackware installation with
> NFS, and no problem also there. It happens that I have also very high
> IO on NFS, so I think I can say it works.

Sounds Well, Merry-X Mas.
I'll try it on the Test-Server-Range.

mfG
	Jojo


-- 
Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@automatix.de **
** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-     **

Re: Reaiser fs

[Ian]

Hey all,
Just thought now might be a good time to mention that I have a few
servers running ReiserFS.  They have NFS'd drives shared across, and
have been up for sometime (they're running Mandrake 7.2).  Now I know
it's Mandrake, and I have no idea what they do to the RieserFS code in
the kernel, so that might be an important note.  Just thought I'd
mention that I have had these servers running for 6+ months :) Also, as
far as hardware, both servers are dual 866 MHz pentiums, with 512 megs
DDR, one with a 15 gig hard drive and the other with a 60 gig drive. 
Hope this information helps :)

--Ian Schroeder-Anderson

On Mon, 2001-12-24 at 12:32, Juergen Sauer wrote:
> Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2001 15:53 schrieb Luigi Genoni:
> > I am using NFS to share /usr and /home with reiserFS on three dual
> > Athlon 1500XP, and they have 1 month of uptime and no problems till
> > now. I am using kernel 2.4.13+mosix. I am also using a 2.4.17 NFS
> > server with reiserFS on a k6-II 475Mhz, for slackware installation with
> > NFS, and no problem also there. It happens that I have also very high
> > IO on NFS, so I think I can say it works.
> 
> Sounds Well, Merry-X Mas.
> I'll try it on the Test-Server-Range.
> 
> mfG
> 	Jojo
> 
> 
> -- 
> Jürgen Sauer - AutomatiX GmbH, +49-4209-4699, jojo@automatix.de **
> ** Das Linux Systemhaus - Service - Support - Server - Lösungen **
> http://www.automatix.de to Mail me: remove: -not-for-spawm-     **
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> 

Re: Reaiser fs

[Alan Cox]

> Ooops, i figured out what went wrong, but if I have to
> enable the experimental drivers, of which Reiser is
> not, then why is ext3 a choice when it is labeled
> experimental and I did not enable the experimental drivers?

It would mean that not all the experimental checks are right. Take a look
at fs/Config.in and you can probably see how to fix it and then send
Marcelo a patch