From: "Anish Srivastava" <anishs@vsnl.com>
To: "Rik van Riel" <riel@conectiva.com.br>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua>
Subject: Re: kswapd kills linux box with kernel 2.4.17
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 19:24:10 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001a01c1a0f0$c8416a50$3c00a8c0@baazee.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33L.0201181741280.32617-100000@imladris.surriel.com>
Hi! Rik,
Thanks for your help.
I have successfully patched the kernel with your patches
recompiled and installed it on my development system
the hardware of which is identical to my Production machine (e.g. 8CPU, 8GB
RAM)
I compiled the kernel with glibc-2.2.2-10 (redhat)
I did some performance testing on my box by doing a full oracle dump and
running some
big java jobs. Well Kswapd now seems to be behaving....(thankfully!!)
When I do a top it shows me
Mem: 8263740K av, 2967608K used, 5296132K free, 0K shrd, 6120K
buff
Swap: 2048248K av, 0K used, 2048248K free 2530948K
cached
Now the cached part never gets freed and just keeps piling up & so does the
used memory.
On my production box with (kernel 2.4.13), both cached & memory used
keet on increasing till it exhausts the entire physical RAM and the box
falls over.
It just doesn't swap.....(I thought with 8GB RAM I wouldnt need swap)
Anyways, then I updated the bdflush parameters....after that the memory does
get
reclaimed but only by a small percentage, so it hardly made any
difference..Memory still
keeps on piling up...forcing me to reboot the box everyday.
Do I need to make any changes to bdflush, freepages etc in /proc/sys/vm ??
Also, is it normal for linux to just keep on eating memory even though most
of the
processes are sleeping and not reclaim memory till the physical RAM is
exhausted
Once, again I thank you for your response and assistance. I really look
forward to
hearing from you again!!
Best regards,
Anish Srivastava
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rik van Riel" <riel@conectiva.com.br>
To: "Anish Srivastava" <anishs@vsnl.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 1:12 AM
Subject: Re: kswapd kills linux box with kernel 2.4.17
> On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Anish Srivastava wrote:
>
> > I am having a box with 8GB RAM and 8 CPU's.
>
> > Can any of you help??
>
> There are two kernel patches which could help you, either
> Andrea Arcangeli's VM patch (available from kernel.org)
> or my -rmap VM patch (available from surriel.com/patches).
>
> kind regards,
>
> Rik
> --
> "Linux holds advantages over the single-vendor commercial OS"
> -- Microsoft's "Competing with Linux" document
>
> http://www.surriel.com/ http://distro.conectiva.com/
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-19 13:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-18 15:10 kswapd kills linux box with kernel 2.4.17 Anish Srivastava
2002-01-18 19:42 ` Rik van Riel
2002-01-19 13:54 ` Anish Srivastava [this message]
2002-01-19 14:33 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001a01c1a0f0$c8416a50$3c00a8c0@baazee.com' \
--to=anishs@vsnl.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=riel@conectiva.com.br \
--cc=vda@port.imtp.ilyichevsk.odessa.ua \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox