From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:08:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:07:54 -0400 Received: from mail.cis.nctu.edu.tw ([140.113.23.5]:41738 "EHLO mail.cis.nctu.edu.tw") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 17 May 2001 13:07:38 -0400 Message-ID: <001b01c0def4$7d7d15f0$73c0718c@SpeedPC16> Reply-To: "gis88530" From: "gis88530" To: In-Reply-To: <3B03EE1E.5A050E1B@TeraPort.de> Subject: sniffer Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 01:12:01 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="big5" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Dear all, Do you know that why tcpdump will loss some packet passing in the subnet? Sorry, I mean that if there are 99Mbps packet in the ethernet, but tcpdump just find out 80Mbps packet. Why? What thing affect packet loss? Thanks Tom