From: "Matthew D. Pitts" <mpitts@suite224.net>
To: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk)
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2002 23:07:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001d01c282ef$578abd20$f642b0d1@pcs686> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1036277779.16971.76.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk
> On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 21:57, Patrick Finnegan wrote:
> > On 2 Nov 2002, Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, 2002-11-02 at 20:36, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> > > > Oh please....
> > > > Wouldn't it be more helpful to iron the (few) small glitches out of
the
> > > > qt based one than write a new one just because you don't happen to
like
> > > > the library?
> > >
> > > Lota of installations have gtk but don't have qt.
> >
> > And a lot of installations have QT but not GTK... This feels like a vi
vs
> > emacs discussion.
>
> It sort of is. The difference being its "do I send you a vi macro or an
> emacs macro", and the obvious answer in this case being that if someone
> wants go write both then we all win.
I agree, Alan. And I would like to ask that someone improve the library
search logic...
Matthew D. Pitts
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-03 4:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-25 22:21 Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk) Romain Lievin
2002-11-02 7:03 ` Nero
2002-11-02 20:36 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-11-02 17:00 ` Jon Portnoy
2002-11-02 22:19 ` bert hubert
2002-11-02 19:45 ` Nero
2002-11-02 20:42 ` Xavier Bestel
2002-11-02 21:12 ` David B. Stevens
2002-11-02 21:07 ` Russell King
2002-11-02 22:43 ` Marek Habersack
2002-11-02 22:48 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 21:25 ` Dave Jones
2002-11-02 21:59 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-02 21:57 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-02 22:06 ` Russell King
2002-11-02 22:33 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-02 22:34 ` Russell King
2002-11-03 3:18 ` Gerhard Mack
2002-11-02 22:47 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 23:03 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-02 22:56 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-02 23:07 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-03 4:07 ` Matthew D. Pitts [this message]
2002-11-04 4:57 ` Stefan Traby
2002-11-04 6:21 ` Sam Ravnborg
2002-11-02 23:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2002-11-02 22:43 ` Nero
2002-11-02 23:59 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-03 0:06 ` J.A. Magallón
2002-11-02 23:16 ` Nero
2002-11-03 1:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-11-03 3:09 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 9:47 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2002-11-03 12:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2002-11-03 4:42 ` Randy.Dunlap
2002-11-03 0:07 ` Patrick Finnegan
2002-11-03 3:53 ` George Staikos
2002-11-03 9:08 ` Nero
2002-11-06 0:45 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-11-06 1:25 ` Mariusz Zielinski
2002-11-03 1:15 ` Rando Christensen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-31 13:43 Where's the documentation for Kconfig? Matthew Wilcox
2002-10-31 14:43 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-01 12:52 ` Russell King
2002-11-01 13:50 ` Roman Zippel
2002-11-01 19:31 ` Russell King
2002-11-01 20:35 ` Roman Zippel
[not found] ` <20020625221306.GA439@free.fr>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0211021254420.6949-100000@serv>
2002-11-02 13:20 ` Kconfig (qt) -> Gconfig (gtk+) Romain Lievin
2002-11-02 14:45 ` Roman Zippel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001d01c282ef$578abd20$f642b0d1@pcs686' \
--to=mpitts@suite224.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox