From: "Jeff Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.org>
To: "J Sloan" <jjs@pobox.com>
Cc: "Charles-Edouard Ruault" <ce@ruault.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: File system Corruption with 2.4.16
Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 17:52:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001e01c17acb$a44b69c0$f5976dcf@nwfs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3C0954D5.6AA3532B@ruault.com> <3C09580F.5F323195@pobox.com> <3C095B0B.7EA478C1@ruault.com> <003601c17ac2$7a8dec10$f5976dcf@nwfs> <3C096DB3.204CE41C@pobox.com>
----- Original Message -----
From: "J Sloan" <jjs@pobox.com>
To: "Jeff Merkey" <jmerkey@timpanogas.org>
Cc: "Charles-Edouard Ruault" <ce@ruault.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Saturday, December 01, 2001 4:54 PM
Subject: Re: File system Corruption with 2.4.16
> Jeff Merkey wrote:
>
> > I am seeing corruption on 2.4.16 (2.4.17-pre1/2) as well. Whatever this
> > gentlemen is doing is making it show up quicker, but I am on my fourth
> > interation of fsck'ing 2.4.16 on my production server with NWFS builds.
I
> > am looking through Al Viros's inode code changes to see if there's hole
> > somewhere. This problem appears to be related to low memory conditions.
I
> > see it when memory is getting low. May be VM related as well.
>
> Just to be positive, can you reproduce the
> problem without nwfs?
Yes. The problem shows up on ext2 partitions only. I also have seen a
lockup in NWFS when
I have patched my FS into Linux. The lockup indicates a deadlock in the
inode layers above
me. I see this lockup when I have more than one file system mounted at a
time. It does not happen
when only a single volume (superblock) has been mounted, only with
multiples. Ditto the ext2
corruption. It only shows up when more than one superblock is active.
Perhaps this will help
narrow down the problem. Since I have a VFS of my own, I could help track
this down, but it
will be tommorrow, I am working on NWFS tools code today. :-)
Jeff
>
> cu
>
> jjs
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-12-02 0:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-12-01 22:08 File system Corruption with 2.4.16 Charles-Edouard Ruault
2001-12-01 22:22 ` J Sloan
2001-12-01 22:34 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2001-12-01 23:47 ` Jeff Merkey
2001-12-01 23:54 ` J Sloan
2001-12-02 0:52 ` Jeff Merkey [this message]
2001-12-02 1:31 ` Stephane Jourdois
2001-12-02 2:58 ` Jeff Merkey
2001-12-02 4:54 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2001-12-02 6:00 ` Tom Vier
2001-12-02 6:27 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2001-12-02 6:03 ` J Sloan
[not found] ` <1007273541.408.5.camel@psuedomode>
2001-12-02 6:51 ` Charles-Edouard Ruault
2001-12-02 7:25 ` J Sloan
2001-12-02 12:03 ` Heinz Diehl
2001-12-02 18:11 ` Kenneth Johansson
2001-12-02 18:55 ` Rene Rebe
2001-12-02 6:08 ` J Sloan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001e01c17acb$a44b69c0$f5976dcf@nwfs' \
--to=jmerkey@timpanogas.org \
--cc=ce@ruault.com \
--cc=jjs@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox