* Access past end of device
@ 2003-06-04 16:13 Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 17:02 ` Stewart Smith
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Salch @ 2003-06-04 16:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel
I'm using a dell powerall web 120 with scsi drives installed
Using redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.18-19.7.x kernel installed
And when using badblocks on the swap partition I get
Attempt to access beyond end of device
08:06: rw=0, want=1044196, limit=1044193
1044192
done
Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found.
And fdisk reports there to be 1044193+ blocks in the partition ?
I wish to be personally CC'ed any answer / comments..
Thanks a million
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Access past end of device
2003-06-04 16:13 Access past end of device Jeremy Salch
@ 2003-06-04 17:02 ` Stewart Smith
2003-06-04 17:14 ` Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 17:23 ` Jeremy Salch
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stewart Smith @ 2003-06-04 17:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Salch; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:13:02AM -0500, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I'm using a dell powerall web 120 with scsi drives installed
> Using redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.18-19.7.x kernel installed
>
> Attempt to access beyond end of device
> 08:06: rw=0, want=1044196, limit=1044193
> 1044192
> Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found.
> And fdisk reports there to be 1044193+ blocks in the partition ?
Sounds like the partition map is a bit incorrect.
Try running badblocks on the drive itself (/dev/hda, not hda1).
If the problem disappears then it's with the partition map (i'd guess).
- stew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Access past end of device
2003-06-04 17:02 ` Stewart Smith
@ 2003-06-04 17:14 ` Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 17:23 ` Jeremy Salch
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Salch @ 2003-06-04 17:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Stewart Smith'; +Cc: linux-kernel
Ok I'll give that a try. One other question. If the partitiontable was bad
wouldn't fdisk report a incorrect size for the partitions that are having
the problems ?
Also the system freezes when under a heavy load without giving any error
output. What it does do is report something like 600000% idle time in top
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Smith [mailto:stewart@linux.org.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Jeremy Salch
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Access past end of device
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:13:02AM -0500, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I'm using a dell powerall web 120 with scsi drives installed Using
> redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.18-19.7.x kernel installed
>
> Attempt to access beyond end of device
> 08:06: rw=0, want=1044196, limit=1044193
> 1044192
> Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found.
> And fdisk reports there to be 1044193+ blocks in the partition ?
Sounds like the partition map is a bit incorrect.
Try running badblocks on the drive itself (/dev/hda, not hda1). If the
problem disappears then it's with the partition map (i'd guess).
- stew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* RE: Access past end of device
2003-06-04 17:02 ` Stewart Smith
2003-06-04 17:14 ` Jeremy Salch
@ 2003-06-04 17:23 ` Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 18:40 ` Stewart Smith
1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jeremy Salch @ 2003-06-04 17:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Stewart Smith'; +Cc: linux-kernel
I did a fdisk on the device /dev/sda and it found no bad blocks.
I was given the suggestion from one person it sounds like a kernel bug since
redhat patches their kernels soo much.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stewart Smith [mailto:stewart@linux.org.au]
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 12:02 PM
To: Jeremy Salch
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Access past end of device
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 11:13:02AM -0500, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I'm using a dell powerall web 120 with scsi drives installed Using
> redhat 7.2 with the 2.4.18-19.7.x kernel installed
>
> Attempt to access beyond end of device
> 08:06: rw=0, want=1044196, limit=1044193
> 1044192
> Pass completed, 1 bad blocks found.
> And fdisk reports there to be 1044193+ blocks in the partition ?
Sounds like the partition map is a bit incorrect.
Try running badblocks on the drive itself (/dev/hda, not hda1). If the
problem disappears then it's with the partition map (i'd guess).
- stew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: Access past end of device
2003-06-04 17:23 ` Jeremy Salch
@ 2003-06-04 18:40 ` Stewart Smith
0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Stewart Smith @ 2003-06-04 18:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeremy Salch; +Cc: linux-kernel
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 12:23:50PM -0500, Jeremy Salch wrote:
> I did a fdisk on the device /dev/sda and it found no bad blocks.
That's a good thing - be greatful :)
> I was given the suggestion from one person it sounds like a kernel bug since
> redhat patches their kernels soo much.
Could be, try a kernel.org kernel and see if the problem persists. If it goes away, file a bug report with redhat. I would think fdisk would come up with an error on a corrupt partition map, so if it doesn't then ur probably looking at some oddity... try the kernel.org kernel :)
- stew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2003-06-04 18:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2003-06-04 16:13 Access past end of device Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 17:02 ` Stewart Smith
2003-06-04 17:14 ` Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 17:23 ` Jeremy Salch
2003-06-04 18:40 ` Stewart Smith
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox