linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Hua Zhong" <hzhong@gmail.com>
To: "'Linus Torvalds'" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"'Trond Myklebust'" <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: "'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: recent nfs change causes autofs regression
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 21:47:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <002101c7eb8a$1c20e300$5462a900$@com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.0.999.0708302134500.25853@woody.linux-foundation.org>

> On Fri, 31 Aug 2007, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> >
> > No. Solaris defaults to breaking cache consistency.
> 
> If so, and since that's obviously what people _expect_ to happen, why
> not make that the default, with the "consistent" behaviour being the 
> one that needs an explicit option.
> 
> Just out of curiosity - Hua, is this NFSv2? Especially there, cache
> "consistency" is largely a joke anyway, so defaulting to some annoying
> careful mode is doubly ridiculous.

It's v3 as can be seen from the autofs maps I posted.

These directories are used mostly as read-only and get pulled in via our
build system. We do not actually write to them often, if at all. I don't
think this setup is uncommon, and I am worried that once people start using
the latest kernel their systems will mysteriously break.

> 		Linus


  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-31  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-30 21:07 recent nfs change causes autofs regression Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 22:37 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 22:47   ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 23:22     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 23:30       ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-30 23:37         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-30 23:44           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  4:31             ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  4:38               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  4:47                 ` Hua Zhong [this message]
2007-08-31  4:57                 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  5:09               ` Ian Kent
2007-08-31  7:50               ` Matthias Schniedermeyer
2007-08-31  1:24   ` Andrew Morton
2007-08-31  4:33     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  3:49   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  3:57     ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  4:44     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  4:59       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  5:04         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31  5:16           ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  7:40             ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-08-31  8:07               ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  8:51                 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-08-31 16:43                   ` Linus Torvalds
2007-09-03 13:20                     ` Jakob Oestergaard
2007-09-03 13:43                       ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-31 12:11                 ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 13:12                   ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31 13:50                     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 14:42                       ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-09-04  7:51                 ` David Howells
2007-08-31  8:28               ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31  5:24           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31  5:38         ` Ian Kent
2007-08-31  8:54           ` Martin Knoblauch
2007-08-31 16:21     ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 17:01       ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31 19:03         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 18:47       ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31 19:13         ` Trond Myklebust
2007-08-31 19:35           ` Hua Zhong
2007-08-31 19:41           ` Hua Zhong
2007-09-02  0:58       ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-04  7:54       ` David Howells
2007-09-05 12:35         ` Bill Davidsen
2007-09-05 12:44         ` Ian Kent
2007-09-05 16:26           ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-05 15:34         ` David Howells
2007-09-05 15:37         ` David Howells
2007-09-05 15:50           ` Trond Myklebust
2007-09-06  5:23             ` Ian Kent
2007-09-04  8:02       ` David Howells
2007-09-04  8:35       ` David Howells
2007-09-04  9:04         ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-31  8:14 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2007-08-31  9:05   ` Ian Kent

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='002101c7eb8a$1c20e300$5462a900$@com' \
    --to=hzhong@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).