From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757112Ab2IKGjV (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:39:21 -0400 Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]:46656 "EHLO mailout3.samsung.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756992Ab2IKGjT (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Sep 2012 02:39:19 -0400 X-AuditID: cbfee61b-b7f586d000007adc-a1-504edc953a98 From: Jingoo Han To: balbi@ti.com Cc: "'Grant Likely'" , "'Linus Walleij'" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "'Ryan Mallon'" , "'Jingoo Han'" References: <002f01cd8f4b$b1100a30$13301e90$%han@samsung.com> <20120911063048.GA18072@arwen.pp.htv.fi> In-reply-to: <20120911063048.GA18072@arwen.pp.htv.fi> Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: samsung: use pr_* instead of printk Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 15:39:17 +0900 Message-id: <002201cd8fe8$2aafa070$800ee150$%han@samsung.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-index: Ac2P55+DMdmXQqhdSy+RAEXVMuOttwAADgbA Content-language: ko X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFjrHLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsVy+t9jAd2pd/wCDGbt1bG4vGsOmwOjx+dN cgGMUVw2Kak5mWWpRfp2CVwZ7w4fYS34xFXxY/Fn1gbGAxxdjJwcEgImEjs/HGSCsMUkLtxb z9bFyMUhJLCIUWLCnzeMEM5sJonuv89YQarYBNQkvnw5zA5iiwgISKx/cYkdpIhZ4DCjxKcp 98CKhAQyJH78ncwGYnMKmEr8ufMWzBYWsJNYsqkPrJlFQFXixs1PYKt5BWwlNm4/yw5hC0r8 mHyPBcRmFtCSWL/zOBOELS+xec1b5i5GDqBT1SUe/dWFuMFI4umav1AlIhL7XrxjnMAoNAvJ pFlIJs1CMmkWkpYFjCyrGEVTC5ILipPSc430ihNzi0vz0vWS83M3MYJD+Zn0DsZVDRaHGAU4 GJV4eG9E+wUIsSaWFVfmHmKU4GBWEuH1mwUU4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xCjNwaIkzut0zi5A SCA9sSQ1OzW1ILUIJsvEwSnVwFg0rXl6vmTRV8/3rYvPfDz8KEWwOkXyKpvorgMB4UfvP/xt 84r9YnHb+vXnz3+7ci79YFyrIW/EdEGdG6rGSt4ZxrXPv2pZzEy3PJ1scdY3/8v0TX3x/m5v 9Hq6E6X2HuMq2r+y3cX6Vm1unFpAYF00y8ZA5fQTcY1PD1teeHWtuILhUMg0GSWW4oxEQy3m ouJEADx3mQFhAgAA Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday, September 11, 2012 3:31 PM Felipe Balbi wrote > > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:59:11PM +0900, Jingoo Han wrote: > > This patch uses pr_* instead of printk. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jingoo Han > > --- > > drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c | 6 +++--- > > 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > > index ba126cc..e38d990 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-samsung.c > > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ > > #ifndef DEBUG_GPIO > > #define gpio_dbg(x...) do { } while (0) > > #else > > -#define gpio_dbg(x...) printk(KERN_DEBUG x) > > +#define gpio_dbg(x...) pr_debug(x) > > #endif > > > > int samsung_gpio_setpull_updown(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip, > > @@ -926,10 +926,10 @@ static void __init samsung_gpiolib_add(struct samsung_gpio_chip *chip) > > #ifdef CONFIG_PM > > if (chip->pm != NULL) { > > if (!chip->pm->save || !chip->pm->resume) > > - printk(KERN_ERR "gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n", > > + pr_err("gpio: %s has missing PM functions\n", > > gc->label); > > I would rather see dev_* conversion instead. > > my 2 cents Hi Felipe Balbi, OK, I will replace printk(KERN_ERR...) with dev_err. Thank you. Best regards, Jingoo Han > > -- > balbi