* Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz calculation equation
2023-11-02 15:31 ` Doug Smythies
@ 2023-11-03 1:55 ` Peng Liu
2023-11-03 4:48 ` Wyes Karny
2023-11-28 1:39 ` Len Brown
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Liu @ 2023-11-03 1:55 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Smythies
Cc: linux-pm, linux-kernel, liupeng17, lenb, 'Wyes Karny'
Hi Doug,
Thanks for your information. I wonder whether a submitter will be notified if his/her patch is not accepted. Can I assume that my patch is accepted if no reply is received?
Regards,
Peng
On 2023/11/2 23:31, Doug Smythies wrote:
> Hi Peng and Wyes,
>
> Just for your information about your recent "ping"s about your turbostat patches:
>
> Please be aware that there is rarely any reply. There tends to be about 2 turbostat updates released per year. Your patches are in patchworks [1], as are some others, including an old one of mine from 2023.04.03
> Eventually there will be an update, and hopefully it will include all our patches.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=107
>
> ... Doug
>
> On 2023.10.29 08:12 Peng Liu wrote:
>
>> Ping
>>
>> On 2023/10/7 13:46, Peng Liu wrote:
>>> From: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
>>>
>>> To calculate Bzy_MHz, TSC_delta should multiply APERF_delta instead
>>> of dividing it.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
>>> ---
>>> tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 | 2 +-
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
>>> index 8f08c3fd498d..1ba6340d3b3d 100644
>>> --- a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
>>> +++ b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
>>> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ below the processor's base frequency.
>>>
>>> Busy% = MPERF_delta/TSC_delta
>>>
>>> -Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta/APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
>>> +Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta*APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
>>>
>>> Note that these calculations depend on TSC_delta, so they
>>> are not reliable during intervals when TSC_MHz is not running at the base frequency.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz calculation equation
2023-11-02 15:31 ` Doug Smythies
2023-11-03 1:55 ` Peng Liu
@ 2023-11-03 4:48 ` Wyes Karny
2023-11-28 1:39 ` Len Brown
2 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Wyes Karny @ 2023-11-03 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Smythies; +Cc: 'Peng Liu', linux-pm, linux-kernel, liupeng17, lenb
On 02 Nov 08:31, Doug Smythies wrote:
> Hi Peng and Wyes,
>
> Just for your information about your recent "ping"s about your turbostat patches:
>
> Please be aware that there is rarely any reply. There tends to be about 2 turbostat updates released per year. Your patches are in patchworks [1], as are some others, including an old one of mine from 2023.04.03
> Eventually there will be an update, and hopefully it will include all our patches.
Thanks Doug for the information.
Regards,
Wyes
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=107
>
> ... Doug
>
> On 2023.10.29 08:12 Peng Liu wrote:
>
> > Ping
> >
> > On 2023/10/7 13:46, Peng Liu wrote:
> >> From: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >>
> >> To calculate Bzy_MHz, TSC_delta should multiply APERF_delta instead
> >> of dividing it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> index 8f08c3fd498d..1ba6340d3b3d 100644
> >> --- a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> +++ b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ below the processor's base frequency.
> >>
> >> Busy% = MPERF_delta/TSC_delta
> >>
> >> -Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta/APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >> +Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta*APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >>
> >> Note that these calculations depend on TSC_delta, so they
> >> are not reliable during intervals when TSC_MHz is not running at the base frequency.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz calculation equation
2023-11-02 15:31 ` Doug Smythies
2023-11-03 1:55 ` Peng Liu
2023-11-03 4:48 ` Wyes Karny
@ 2023-11-28 1:39 ` Len Brown
2023-11-29 1:57 ` 回复: [External] " Peng Peng17 Liu
2 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Len Brown @ 2023-11-28 1:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Doug Smythies; +Cc: Peng Liu, Wyes Karny, linux-pm, linux-kernel, liupeng17
Peng Liu,
Thanks for the close read of the documentation, and the patch.
I've applied it, though I re-wrote the commit message (below) to make
it clear it is a documentation fix, as the code was already correct.
thanks,
-Len
ps. I would have replied to your original e-mail, but there was a
period where gmail dropped mail due to space limitations.
No worries, as Doug said, everything is in patchwork.
tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz documentation typo
The code calculates Bzy_MHz by multiplying TSC_delta *
APERF_delta/MPERF_delta
The man page erroneously showed that TSC_delta was divided.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:31 AM Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Peng and Wyes,
>
> Just for your information about your recent "ping"s about your turbostat patches:
>
> Please be aware that there is rarely any reply. There tends to be about 2 turbostat updates released per year. Your patches are in patchworks [1], as are some others, including an old one of mine from 2023.04.03
> Eventually there will be an update, and hopefully it will include all our patches.
>
> [1] https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-pm/list/?series=&submitter=&state=&q=&archive=&delegate=107
>
> ... Doug
>
> On 2023.10.29 08:12 Peng Liu wrote:
>
> > Ping
> >
> > On 2023/10/7 13:46, Peng Liu wrote:
> >> From: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >>
> >> To calculate Bzy_MHz, TSC_delta should multiply APERF_delta instead
> >> of dividing it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> index 8f08c3fd498d..1ba6340d3b3d 100644
> >> --- a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> +++ b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ below the processor's base frequency.
> >>
> >> Busy% = MPERF_delta/TSC_delta
> >>
> >> -Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta/APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >> +Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta*APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >>
> >> Note that these calculations depend on TSC_delta, so they
> >> are not reliable during intervals when TSC_MHz is not running at the base frequency.
>
--
Len Brown, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* 回复: [External] Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz calculation equation
2023-11-28 1:39 ` Len Brown
@ 2023-11-29 1:57 ` Peng Peng17 Liu
0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: Peng Peng17 Liu @ 2023-11-29 1:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Len Brown
Cc: Peng Liu, Wyes Karny, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Doug Smythies
Len,
The new commit message is better. Thanks for your help😊
Regards,
Peng
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
发送时间: 2023年11月28日 9:40
收件人: Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net>
抄送: Peng Liu <pngliu@hotmail.com>; Wyes Karny <wyes.karny@amd.com>; linux-pm@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Peng Peng17 Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
主题: [External] Re: [PATCH] tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz calculation equation
Peng Liu,
Thanks for the close read of the documentation, and the patch.
I've applied it, though I re-wrote the commit message (below) to make it clear it is a documentation fix, as the code was already correct.
thanks,
-Len
ps. I would have replied to your original e-mail, but there was a period where gmail dropped mail due to space limitations.
No worries, as Doug said, everything is in patchwork.
tools/power turbostat: Fix Bzy_MHz documentation typo
The code calculates Bzy_MHz by multiplying TSC_delta * APERF_delta/MPERF_delta
The man page erroneously showed that TSC_delta was divided.
On Thu, Nov 2, 2023 at 11:31 AM Doug Smythies <dsmythies@telus.net> wrote:
>
> Hi Peng and Wyes,
>
> Just for your information about your recent "ping"s about your turbostat patches:
>
> Please be aware that there is rarely any reply. There tends to be
> about 2 turbostat updates released per year. Your patches are in patchworks [1], as are some others, including an old one of mine from 2023.04.03 Eventually there will be an update, and hopefully it will include all our patches.
>
> [1]
> https://apc01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpatc
> hwork.kernel.org%2Fproject%2Flinux-pm%2Flist%2F%3Fseries%3D%26submitte
> r%3D%26state%3D%26q%3D%26archive%3D%26delegate%3D107&data=05%7C01%7Cli
> upeng17%40lenovo.com%7Cb4cd61b01e3b4d8b79ae08dbefb2f521%7C5c7d0b28bdf8
> 410caa934df372b16203%7C0%7C0%7C638367324123743896%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZs
> b3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D
> %7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nsw8vwV2oSAOBVGWTu6PAFeMPhpnZM8AXtzXWpoaRgw%3D&
> reserved=0
>
> ... Doug
>
> On 2023.10.29 08:12 Peng Liu wrote:
>
> > Ping
> >
> > On 2023/10/7 13:46, Peng Liu wrote:
> >> From: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >>
> >> To calculate Bzy_MHz, TSC_delta should multiply APERF_delta instead
> >> of dividing it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Peng Liu <liupeng17@lenovo.com>
> >> ---
> >> tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8 | 2 +-
> >> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> index 8f08c3fd498d..1ba6340d3b3d 100644
> >> --- a/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> +++ b/tools/power/x86/turbostat/turbostat.8
> >> @@ -370,7 +370,7 @@ below the processor's base frequency.
> >>
> >> Busy% = MPERF_delta/TSC_delta
> >>
> >> -Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta/APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >> +Bzy_MHz = TSC_delta*APERF_delta/MPERF_delta/measurement_interval
> >>
> >> Note that these calculations depend on TSC_delta, so they
> >> are not reliable during intervals when TSC_MHz is not running at the base frequency.
>
--
Len Brown, Intel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread