From: "Stuart MacDonald" <stuartm@connecttech.com>
To: "'Paul Fulghum'" <paulkf@microgate.com>, <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: "'Alan Cox'" <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"'Russell King'" <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"'Linux Kernel Mailing List'" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [BUG][2.6.8.1] serial driver hangs SMP kernel, but not the UPkernel
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2004 10:12:38 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002a01c4c025$39f22530$294b82ce@stuartm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <418643E2.9080006@microgate.com>
From: Paul Fulghum [mailto:paulkf@microgate.com]
> Stuart MacDonald wrote:
> > I always thought the whole point of low_latency was to make the
> > receive-path very fast, which means specifically allowing the flip
> > routine to run from the ISR. So checking for calling from
> the ISR and
> > specifically disallowing that is basically negating the
> entire raison
> > d'etre for low_latency.
>
> I was thought it was to speed processing if the
> caller was already in process context. Maybe the
> real intentions are lost to history.
Best person to ask may be Ted; he was once the serial maintainer. Ted?
> Moving forward, Alan stated that the flip
> routine should not be called in interrupt context.
> His last post concerning some transient state
> of low_latency has confused me.
I didn't follow that either, but I wasn't reading too closely.
> Currently, with the 8250 driver and N_TTY
> line discipline, calling the flip routine from
> ISR causes an SMP deadlock. There are two paths that
> cause this:
> 1. low_latency is set
> 2. flip buffer becomes full
>
> So calling the flip routine from the ISR may work
> with some specific drivers, but it would be
> dangerous to assume this works in all cases.
I haven't looked at the 2.6 serial rewrite in depth yet, but the
problem always existed in the 2.4 driver. I got around the problem by
checking for interrupt context and taking the locks or not at a much
earlier stage.
..Stu
www.connecttech.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-01 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-29 19:55 [BUG][2.6.8.1] serial driver hangs SMP kernel, but not the UP kernel Tim_T_Murphy
2004-10-29 20:20 ` Russell King
2004-10-29 22:18 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-10-29 23:40 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-10-30 22:43 ` Alan Cox
2004-10-31 0:26 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-11-01 7:14 ` [BUG][2.6.8.1] serial driver hangs SMP kernel, but not the UPkernel Stuart MacDonald
2004-11-01 14:10 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-11-01 15:12 ` Stuart MacDonald [this message]
2004-11-01 23:02 ` Alan Cox
2004-11-02 0:18 ` Paul Fulghum
2004-10-29 21:08 ` [BUG][2.6.8.1] serial driver hangs SMP kernel, but not the UP kernel Paul Fulghum
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2005-01-10 20:36 [BUG][2.6.8.1] serial driver hangs SMP kernel, but not the UPkernel Tim_T_Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002a01c4c025$39f22530$294b82ce@stuartm' \
--to=stuartm@connecttech.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulkf@microgate.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox