From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751435AbWFPToq (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:44:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751466AbWFPToq (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:44:46 -0400 Received: from orange.blizznet.at ([213.143.111.1]:49370 "EHLO orange.hybridz.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751435AbWFPTop (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Jun 2006 15:44:45 -0400 From: "Ralf Dauberschmidt" To: Subject: AW: sock_alloc() symbol removed in 2.6.10 Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 21:44:37 +0200 Message-ID: <002a01c6917d$4ddbfc80$0200000a@redstorm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcaRXWigh27bDtXuQHGn5Dj5LJD7OwAHsR9Q In-Reply-To: <1150473371.3070.0.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven wrote: > what driver are you looking at that wants to use it? At university we are currently porting a project from a 2.4 series kernel to a recent 2.6 series kernel. This project uses the sock_alloc() function. Stephen Smalley wrote: > Also, it would be better to use sock_create_lite() to ensure proper > handling by the security subsystem. See: > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=git-commits-head&m=108407590404054&w=2 Thanks for the hint, I will use sock_create_lite() instead. Regards, Ralf Dauberschmidt