From: "Manfred Spraul" <manfred@colorfullife.com>
To: "\"Ulrich Weigand\"" <Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: NFS deadlock explained (on S/390)
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2001 20:02:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002d01c1324a$5d9d6790$010411ac@local> (raw)
> Specifically, what happens is that the first CPU runs the QDIO
> bottom half (from ksoftirqd, but this is probably not important).
> That bottom half grabs the QDIO private spinlock, and then
> executes a bunch of code including a dev_kfree_skb_any().
> As we are only in a softirq, not a hard irq, dev_kfree_skb_any()
> call kfree_skb() directly, which happens to invoke the
> udp_write_space() callback in xprt.c. This routine then spins
> trying to acquire the xprt_sock_lock.
I think in_irq() and in_interrupt() should check the cpu interrupt flag
and return TRUE if the per-cpu interrupts are disabled.
The current behavious is just weird:
spin_lock_bh();
in_interrupt(); --> true
spin_unlock_bh();
spin_lock_irq();
in_interrupt(); --> false
spin_unlock_irq();
> Whether this same situation can explain the deadlocks seen on
> other platforms depends on whether the drivers used there exhibit
> similar locking behaviours as the QDIO driver, of course.
It should be possible to detect that automatically: if
dev_kfree_skb_any() is called outside irq context with disabled per-cpu
interrupts then it's probably due to a spin_lock_irq() and could
deadlock.
--
Manfred
next reply other threads:[~2001-08-31 18:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-31 18:02 Manfred Spraul [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-09-03 12:35 NFS deadlock explained (on S/390) Ulrich Weigand
2001-08-31 16:14 Ulrich Weigand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002d01c1324a$5d9d6790$010411ac@local' \
--to=manfred@colorfullife.com \
--cc=Ulrich.Weigand@de.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox