From: "Glover George" <dime@gulfsales.com>
To: "'Mr. James W. Laferriere'" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:56:41 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003601c1ba1e$ce631630$0300a8c0@yellow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202192005050.32040-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>
Ok, after playing with it a little more I found out that the message I'm
getting about the block sizes isn't related to the lockups. I can lock
the system up by tar'ing up the /proc directory (why are you tar'ing the
/proc directory!!! I know!!! But that's not the point). I had no
problem with RH 7.2's supplied 7.2 kernel (2.4.7-10). However, this is
2.4.17 (with the linux-abi patch).
I have been able to make succesful backups as long as I ignore the /proc
directory but something must be wrong. Doing an "ls -la *" doesn't lock
the machine though. Only when tar'ing it (I suppose because of a read).
It doesn't lock up consistently in the same place when reading from the
proc directory however, but always in the proc. I made about 15 test
runs and they all died in proc and --exclude proc doesn't cause it to
lock somewhere else.
I guess the question is (and I've had it for a while) is how do I get
the system to log more info for me? I'm a little new a debugging the
kernel, but I did compile most of the debugging into a test kernel.
However, the system hard locks with no oops or anything in the logs.
The system must be shutdown by holding the power button in for 4
seconds. I know this must not be a huge problem because no ones
mentioned it, so I'd like to do some more investigating on my part.
Thanks for your help.
> Hello Glover , I get the same messages & do not get system
> lock ups . Might try sending a little bit more info about
> what is going on around any of the lock ups . If you can
> reliably lock up the system by accessing the tape drive .
> Then send some info to the list about the system & the tape
> drive and how it is attached to the system . Hth , JimL
> ps: All disk & tape drives are scsi .
>
>
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Glover George wrote:
>
> > I've been experiencing mysterious lockups since upgrading to kernel
> > 2.4.17. Looking in the /var/log/messages I hadn't seen anything
> > suspicious until now. I guess the machine hasn't had time to write
> > this to disk except every now and then. The message
> >
> > Feb 19 11:29:55 butler kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
> >
> > I notice this after rebooting after the crash. So I tried manually
> > doing a tar to the tape drive and was able to successfully lock the
> > machine up. Can someone help me understand this and if it
> is simply a
> > limit problem, why would the machine lock up?
> >
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-20 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-19 17:57 st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes Glover George
2002-02-20 1:15 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-02-20 14:56 ` Glover George [this message]
2002-02-20 15:21 ` Richard B. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003601c1ba1e$ce631630$0300a8c0@yellow' \
--to=dime@gulfsales.com \
--cc=babydr@baby-dragons.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox