public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Glover George" <dime@gulfsales.com>
To: "'Mr. James W. Laferriere'" <babydr@baby-dragons.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:56:41 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003601c1ba1e$ce631630$0300a8c0@yellow> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0202192005050.32040-100000@filesrv1.baby-dragons.com>

Ok, after playing with it a little more I found out that the message I'm
getting about the block sizes isn't related to the lockups.  I can lock
the system up by tar'ing up the /proc directory (why are you tar'ing the
/proc directory!!! I know!!! But that's not the point).  I had no
problem with RH 7.2's supplied 7.2 kernel (2.4.7-10).  However, this is
2.4.17 (with the linux-abi patch). 

I have been able to make succesful backups as long as I ignore the /proc
directory but something must be wrong.  Doing an "ls -la *" doesn't lock
the machine though.  Only when tar'ing it (I suppose because of a read).
It doesn't lock up consistently in the same place when reading from the
proc directory however, but always in the proc.  I made about 15 test
runs and they all died in proc and --exclude proc doesn't cause it to
lock somewhere else.

I guess the question is (and I've had it for a while) is how do I get
the system to log more info for me?  I'm a little new a debugging the
kernel, but I did compile most of the debugging into a test kernel.
However, the system hard locks with no oops or anything in the logs.
The system must be shutdown by holding the power button in for 4
seconds. I know this must not be a huge problem because no ones
mentioned it, so I'd like to do some more investigating on my part.
Thanks for your help.

> 	Hello Glover ,  I get the same messages & do not get system
> 	lock ups .  Might try sending a little bit more info about
> 	what is going on around any of the lock ups .  If you can
> 	reliably lock up the system by accessing the tape drive .
> 	Then send some info to the list about the system & the tape
> 	drive and how it is attached to the system .  Hth ,  JimL
> ps:	All disk & tape drives are scsi .
> 
> 
> On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Glover George wrote:
> 
> > I've been experiencing mysterious lockups since upgrading to kernel 
> > 2.4.17.  Looking in the /var/log/messages I hadn't seen anything 
> > suspicious until now.  I guess the machine hasn't had time to write 
> > this to disk except every now and then.  The message
> >
> > Feb 19 11:29:55 butler kernel: st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes.
> >
> > I notice this after rebooting after the crash.  So I tried manually 
> > doing a tar to the tape drive and was able to successfully lock the 
> > machine up.  Can someone help me understand this and if it 
> is simply a 
> > limit problem, why would the machine lock up?
> >


  reply	other threads:[~2002-02-20 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-02-19 17:57 st0: Block limits 1 - 16777215 bytes Glover George
2002-02-20  1:15 ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2002-02-20 14:56   ` Glover George [this message]
2002-02-20 15:21     ` Richard B. Johnson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003601c1ba1e$ce631630$0300a8c0@yellow' \
    --to=dime@gulfsales.com \
    --cc=babydr@baby-dragons.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox