From: "Robbert Kouprie" <robbert@radium.jvb.tudelft.nl>
To: "'Helge Hafting'" <helgehaf@aitel.hist.no>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: The buggy APIC of the Abit BP6
Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 15:30:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003601c212de$77316240$020da8c0@nitemare> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3D08603E.91DE5C75@aitel.hist.no>
Helge Hafting wrote:
> > Jun 12 23:47:56 radium kernel: unexpected IRQ trap at vector 7d
> > Jun 12 23:47:56 radium kernel: unexpected IRQ trap at vector 7d
>
> It _can_ be solved - rebooting cures it, so assuming the problem
> is autodetectable it _can_ be solved by doing whatever it is
> a reboot (or driver reload) does to the APIC.
True.
> My guess is that the APIC setup for that IRQ have to be reprogrammed.
> you could do that as a quirk for the BP6.
> The first question is if there is a reliable way to detect this
> condition. "No interrupts from a device" could simply mean that
> it isn't used much at the time. You get a unexpected IRQ trap - do
> the problem always manifest itself this way?
Yes, I always get the "unexpected IRQ trap at vector 7d" message. This
is the same message even with different NICs (though they were placed in
the same PCI slot). About 30-120 seconds after this message (depending
on some driver timeout value I guess) the NETDEV watchdog kicks in with
a "eth0: transmit timed out".
> The second question is if all the PCI card drivers out there
> survive a lost interrupt handled outside the driver.
> If not, you have to close+reopen the device, and that involves
> userspace.
> A network card will need reinitialization, a disk controller
> remounting...
That could indeed be a problem. But this will become clear pretty soon
once this APIC reprogramming workaround is actually implemented in the
kernel. Then I will be able to test that. Any ideas how this workaround
in the kernel would look like?
Thanks for the help,
- Robbert Kouprie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-13 13:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-12 22:33 The buggy APIC of the Abit BP6 Robbert Kouprie
2002-06-13 9:05 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-13 13:30 ` Robbert Kouprie [this message]
2002-06-14 10:54 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-18 15:30 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-06-18 15:17 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2002-06-19 12:47 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-19 13:23 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-06-19 14:03 ` Keith Owens
2002-06-19 14:35 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-20 1:50 ` Robbert Kouprie
2002-06-19 14:22 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-20 12:21 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-20 13:10 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2002-06-21 13:02 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-20 22:29 ` Kevin Krieser
2002-06-14 15:07 ` Raphael Manfredi
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-14 16:49 Robbert Kouprie
2002-06-14 18:41 ` Raphael Manfredi
2002-06-18 7:33 ` Helge Hafting
2002-06-18 9:53 Robbert Kouprie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003601c212de$77316240$020da8c0@nitemare' \
--to=robbert@radium.jvb.tudelft.nl \
--cc=helgehaf@aitel.hist.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox