From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933156AbdC2WQS (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:16:18 -0400 Received: from cmta20.telus.net ([209.171.16.93]:37647 "EHLO cmta20.telus.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932377AbdC2WQQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 29 Mar 2017 18:16:16 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Nv4+S4VJ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=zJWegnE7BH9C0Gl4FFgQyA==:117 a=zJWegnE7BH9C0Gl4FFgQyA==:17 a=Pyq9K9CWowscuQLKlpiwfMBGOR0=:19 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=QyXUC8HyAAAA:8 a=f7xRYWkJPpRZk_ItzzsA:9 a=7Zwj6sZBwVKJAoWSPKxL6X1jA+E=:19 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=avl4LiGQNoF5OB0DmCJ7:22 From: "Doug Smythies" To: "'Rafael J. Wysocki'" Cc: "'Srinivas Pandruvada'" , "'LKML'" , "'Linux PM'" , "'Doug Smythies'" References: <2694426.SgxlQuL17D@aspire.rjw.lan> <2326598.n0dkg1GrdM@aspire.rjw.lan> <2188688.SPioTUuSuO@aspire.rjw.lan> jZL3cbFe8sVy3jZL4c6fog tLegcUXspnsYHtLehcsgkR In-Reply-To: tLegcUXspnsYHtLehcsgkR Subject: RE: [Update][PATCH v3 2/3] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Do not reinit performance limits in ->setpolicy Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:16:04 -0700 Message-ID: <004201d2a8da$12e74910$38b5db30$@net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdKTpXnUUbdikSzzSsGD1w38oPzUpAVLkpjwAAFpVXA= Content-Language: en-ca X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfOipW1dtw+1jPC4hMBBWuWPz8huASsTM5NAOeFTYfW4VINZdw0FUZTdRLvNFtBXO2hFNA0zVZYd9FuE7hqNl+7TO8bu0jUVexllvVO9n3QFjQy1K32gH ETWUTJjvZ6P0pH94YsphEc8W8KK5nYlO2F5qyYDsxCv6y9thDvvR/m5vfv9+JQM5AIEe3xXj3ZaXXWoDaF7CU4Ew2k49owvmJXC5GM9y4s3UF3jTBch1MY0b ECFN8uDxWoryh8UX/NsbYulHv2pbPeHjX0Dt6uUV0LU8fuRPZgVyXVz8DqUI+WR2e1HF4zr5ddxtVS7ujnmKaw== Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Rafael, Disregard. I see this was fixed in kernel 4.11-rc4. While kernel 4.11-rc4 was where I thought I started from earlier, actually I was running 4.11-rc2 at the time. sorry for the noise. On 2017.03.29 15:01 Doug Smythies wrote: > Sorry for the delay, but I didn't notice until today that this > commit causes a regression, at least in my computer. > > I have not figured out exactly what is wrong, as I must > admit I am finding these policy interactions difficult > to follow. > > On 2017.03.02 14:29 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >>From: Rafael J. Wysocki >> >> If the current P-state selection algorithm is set to "performance" >> in intel_pstate_set_policy(), the limits may be initialized from > > ... [cut] ... > > Going back to kernel 4.11-rc1 I get this after boot**: > > $ uname -a > Linux s15 4.11.0-rc1-stock #217 SMP Sun Mar 5 15:34:38 PST 2017 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux