From: Simon Trimmer <simont@opensource.cirrus.com>
To: 'Mark Brown' <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: <tiwai@suse.com>, <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>,
<alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] ASoC/HDA cs35l56: Remove redundant IRQ handling
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2024 14:46:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004601dafed0$d8ff8cd0$8afea670$@opensource.cirrus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e1aeb66c-ecb3-4778-b306-f3a212caf879@sirena.org.uk>
On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:25:00PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 12:07:00PM +0000, Simon Trimmer wrote:
> > The IRQ handling in the cs35l56 driver was purely informational. It was
> > not necessary to support the HDA or ASoC driver functionality and added
> > unnecessary complexity to the drivers.
> >
> > As the IRQ signal GPIO line could be connected and shared with other
> > components the handling is replaced with a regmap patch to ensure the
> > cs35l56 IRQ sources are masked and will not generate interrupts that go
> > unhandled.
>
> Given that the code is there now and has been since the driver was
> introduced about 18 months ago what's the ongoing cost of having it?
> The information it's providing is notification of hardware faults,
> reporting those does seem useful.
Originally we were expecting to use the IRQ mechanism for an event logging
stream that would function in a similar manner to compressed streams to be
able to get an information feed for debug and tuning tools, but those were
never created and the logging infrastructure not implemented.
It's quite a spread of code and a lot of complexity in the regular execution
paths managing them / synchronizing the contexts, there is more going on in
the SoundWire bus variant compared to the conventional i2c/spi that it is
hard to justify maintaining it all for a couple of log messages - in the
event that someone did encounter the two situations being reported the
regmap dump would point us to the cause pretty quickly.
-Simon
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-09-04 13:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-04 12:07 [PATCH] ASoC/HDA cs35l56: Remove redundant IRQ handling Simon Trimmer
2024-09-04 12:25 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-04 13:46 ` Simon Trimmer [this message]
2024-09-04 16:17 ` Simon Trimmer
2024-09-04 17:27 ` Mark Brown
2024-09-05 10:15 ` Simon Trimmer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004601dafed0$d8ff8cd0$8afea670$@opensource.cirrus.com' \
--to=simont@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox