From: Slavcho Nikolov <snikolov@okena.com>
To: jt@hpl.hp.com, Linux kernel mailing list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com>
Subject: Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer?
Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2002 09:39:12 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <004c01c27a99$927b8a30$800a140a@SLNW2K> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20021023003959.GA23155@bougret.hpl.hp.com
Unfortunately, I cannot assume that every L2 (or maybe I can, we'll see) is
ethernet and I definitely cannot know in advance that every L3 is IP.
Nor can the assumption be made that netfilter has been built into the
kernel.
If I define my own private protocol handler (to catch all), I see cloned
skb's
which is not what I want. I tried that and dropped each one of them in the
handler, yet traffic continued to flow unimpeded (so I must have dropped
clones).
As for GPL, I hope that commercial enterprises be allowed to utilize
business models
which do not necessarily consist in providing services around free software.
The more replaceable hooks you provide to filesystems and network stacks,
the better.
S.N.
| Assuming that every L2 is Ethernet and every L3 is IP ?
| Well, I've got news for you : IrDA drivers are using
| netif_rx() to pass IrLAP frames to the IrDA stack, and 802.11 driver
| in the future will pass 802.11 frames to the 802.2 LLC layer via
| netif_rx().
| Please don't do that, I don't want people breaking the IrDA
| stack in weird ways just because some random clueless code hijacked
| netif_rx(). Use netfilters, or define your own private protocol/packet
| type to do what you want.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-10-23 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-10-23 0:39 feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer? Jean Tourrilhes
2002-10-23 13:39 ` Slavcho Nikolov [this message]
2002-10-23 14:03 ` Chris Friesen
2002-10-23 16:23 ` over&out (Re: feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer?) Slavcho Nikolov
2002-10-23 22:59 ` jw schultz
2002-10-24 6:25 ` Gilad Ben-Yossef
2002-10-24 7:08 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-25 11:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2002-10-23 16:48 ` feature request - why not make netif_rx() a pointer? Jean Tourrilhes
2002-10-23 17:27 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-24 4:13 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 9:28 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-10-24 10:15 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-24 11:01 ` Henning Schmiedehausen
2002-10-24 13:30 ` Slavcho Nikolov
2002-10-24 13:46 ` David S. Miller
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-10-22 21:01 Slavcho Nikolov
2002-10-22 21:15 ` Matti Aarnio
2002-10-22 22:42 ` David S. Miller
2002-10-22 23:16 ` Ben Greear
2002-10-22 23:29 ` Jeff Garzik
2002-10-23 15:16 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-10-23 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-23 16:26 ` Henning P. Schmiedehausen
2002-10-22 21:30 ` Alan Cox
2002-10-22 22:40 ` David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='004c01c27a99$927b8a30$800a140a@SLNW2K' \
--to=snikolov@okena.com \
--cc=jgarzik@mandrakesoft.com \
--cc=jt@hpl.hp.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox