From: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"Jani Nikula" <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com>,
Chris Wilson <chris.p.wilson@intel.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] lib/ref_tracker: remove warnings in case of allocation failure
Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2022 11:44:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00534db7-6b0e-7efa-11a1-d386e2f71a23@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANn89i+E3z-iXSJh8316KSycYk2VTS-n0E=tAOj23fuDSi1Zjg@mail.gmail.com>
On 22.02.2022 00:54, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 3:26 PM Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com> wrote:
>> Library can handle allocation failures. To avoid allocation warnings
>> __GFP_NOWARN has been added everywhere. Moreover GFP_ATOMIC has been
>> replaced with GFP_NOWAIT in case of stack allocation on tracker free
>> call.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>
>> ---
>> lib/ref_tracker.c | 5 +++--
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/ref_tracker.c b/lib/ref_tracker.c
>> index 2ef4596b6b36f..cae4498fcfd70 100644
>> --- a/lib/ref_tracker.c
>> +++ b/lib/ref_tracker.c
>> @@ -189,7 +189,7 @@ int ref_tracker_alloc(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
>> unsigned long entries[REF_TRACKER_STACK_ENTRIES];
>> struct ref_tracker *tracker;
>> unsigned int nr_entries;
>> - gfp_t gfp_mask = gfp;
>> + gfp_t gfp_mask = gfp | __GFP_NOWARN;
> SGTM
>
>> unsigned long flags;
>>
>> WARN_ON_ONCE(dir->dead);
>> @@ -237,7 +237,8 @@ int ref_tracker_free(struct ref_tracker_dir *dir,
>> return -EEXIST;
>> }
>> nr_entries = stack_trace_save(entries, ARRAY_SIZE(entries), 1);
>> - stack_handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries, GFP_ATOMIC);
>> + stack_handle = stack_depot_save(entries, nr_entries,
>> + GFP_NOWAIT | __GFP_NOWARN);
> Last time I looked at this, __GFP_NOWARN was enforced in __stack_depot_save()
You are right, however I am not sure if we should count on unexpected
(at least for me) and undocumented behavior.
Currently we do not need to rely on some hidden feature.
Regards
Andrzej
>
>> spin_lock_irqsave(&dir->lock, flags);
>> if (tracker->dead) {
>> --
>> 2.25.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-22 10:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-21 23:25 [PATCH v3 00/11] drm/i915: use ref_tracker library for tracking wakerefs Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] [DO NOT MERGE] ref_tracker: implement use-after-free detection Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] [DO NOT MERGE] ref_tracker: add a count of untracked references Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] [DO NOT MERGE] ref_tracker: remove filter_irq_stacks() call Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] lib/ref_tracker: add unlocked leak print helper Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] lib/ref_tracker: __ref_tracker_dir_print improve printing Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-22 0:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-22 10:27 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] lib/ref_tracker: add printing to memory buffer Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] lib/ref_tracker: remove warnings in case of allocation failure Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:54 ` Eric Dumazet
2022-02-22 10:44 ` Andrzej Hajda [this message]
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] drm/i915: Separate wakeref tracking Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-22 7:12 ` [Intel-gfx] " Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-22 9:28 ` Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-22 9:44 ` Ville Syrjälä
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] drm/i915: Track leaked gt->wakerefs Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] drm/i915: Correct type of wakeref variable Andrzej Hajda
2022-02-21 23:25 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] drm/i915: replace Intel internal tracker with kernel core ref_tracker Andrzej Hajda
2023-01-06 14:15 ` [Intel-gfx] " Das, Nirmoy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00534db7-6b0e-7efa-11a1-d386e2f71a23@intel.com \
--to=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
--cc=chris.p.wilson@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox