From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:45:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:45:42 -0400 Received: from smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.61]:47292 "EHLO smtp02.mrf.mail.rcn.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:45:39 -0400 Message-ID: <005a01c25b1b$ac7fb390$3083accf@tabasco> From: "Bill Davenport" To: Subject: Can prune_icache safely discard inodes which have only clean pages? (2.4.18) Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2002 07:49:53 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I've got a system which has a fairly large amount of physical memory (2GB) that experiences performance problems after a large number of files have been accessed. Looking into the slab_info I discovered that a very large number of inodes are currently present in the system (along with many buffer headers). Digging deeper I was able to determine that most of the inodes were on the inode_unused chain, but were being skipped over during the prunce_icache processing because they have a non-zero number of pages (i_data.nrpages). Looking a bit deeper I discovered that most of the inodes had only pages that are on the clean_pages list, with these pages also accounting for many of the buffer heads. The system wasn't attempting to free these pages (presumably since it still had a fair amount of physical memory available, so it didn't need to do this). Is there any danger in changing prune_icache to also pick an inode for pruning if it has a non-zero page count where the dirty_list and locked_list are empty? In particular, the existing code in fs/inode.c looks somewhat like: #define CAN_UNUSE(inode) \ ((((inode)->i_state | (inode)->i_data.nrpages) == 0) && \ !inode_has_buffers(inode)) void prune_icache(int goal) { ... while (entry != &inode_unused) { ... if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR|I_LOCK)) continue; if (!CAN_UNUSE(inode)) continue; Remove inode from i_hash and add to freeable } ... dispose_list(freeable); ... } and I'd like to change it to: void prune_icache(int goal) { ... while (entry != &inode_unused) { ... if (inode->i_state & (I_FREEING|I_CLEAR|I_LOCK)) continue; if ((inode->i_state != 0) || inode_has_buffers(inode)) continue; if (inode->i_data.nrpages != 0) { if ((!list_empty(&inode->i_data.dirty_pages)) || (!list_empty(&inode->i_data.locked_pages))) { /* skip if any dirty or locked pages */ continue; } } Remove inode from i_hash and add to freeable } ... dispose_list(freeable); ... }