public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@oracle.com>
To: clm@fb.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, vschneid@redhat.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [REGRESSION][v6.17-rc1]sched/fair: Bump sd->max_newidle_lb_cost when newidle balance fails
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 16:23:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <006c9df2-b691-47f1-82e6-e233c3f91faf@oracle.com> (raw)

Hi Chris,

During testing, we are seeing a ~6% performance regression with the 
upstream stable v6.12.43 kernel (And Oracle UEK 
6.12.0-104.43.4.el9uek.x86_64 kernel) when running the Phoronix 
pts/apache benchmark with 100 concurrent requests [0].  The regression 
is seen with the following hardware:

PROCESSOR: Intel Xeon Platinum 8167M Core Count: 8 Thread Count: 16 
Extensions: SSE 4.2 + AVX512CD + AVX2 + AVX + RDRAND + FSGSBASE Cache 
Size: 16 MB Microcode: 0x1 Core Family: Cascade Lake

After performing a bisect, we found that the performance regression was 
introduced by the following commit:

Stable v6.12.43: fc4289233e4b ("sched/fair: Bump sd->max_newidle_lb_cost 
when newidle balance fails")
Mainline v6.17-rc1: 155213a2aed4 ("sched/fair: Bump 
sd->max_newidle_lb_cost when newidle balance fails")

Reverting this commit causes the performance regression to not exist.

I was hoping to get your feedback, since you are the patch author.  Do 
you think gathering any additional data will help diagnose this issue?

Thanks,

Joe


[0]https://openbenchmarking.org/test/pts/apache-3.0.0


             reply	other threads:[~2025-10-06 20:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 20:23 Joseph Salisbury [this message]
2025-10-06 21:23 ` [REGRESSION][v6.17-rc1]sched/fair: Bump sd->max_newidle_lb_cost when newidle balance fails Chris Mason
2025-10-07 11:34   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-10  1:04     ` [External] : " Joseph Salisbury
2025-10-10 17:09       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-17 17:01         ` Joseph Salisbury
2025-10-30  7:29           ` Adam Li
2025-10-31 21:16             ` [External] : " Joseph Salisbury
2025-11-04 18:11             ` Joseph Salisbury
2025-10-30  7:22         ` Adam Li
2025-10-30  9:30           ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-30 20:53             ` Dietmar Eggemann
2025-10-31  2:46             ` Adam Li
2025-10-10  1:14     ` Joseph Salisbury
2025-10-07 20:22   ` [External] : " Joseph Salisbury
2025-10-10 13:09   ` Hazem Mohamed Abuelfotoh
2025-10-27 18:36   ` Josh Don

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=006c9df2-b691-47f1-82e6-e233c3f91faf@oracle.com \
    --to=joseph.salisbury@oracle.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mgorman@suse.de \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=vschneid@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox