From: "Madhusudhan" <madhu.cr@ti.com>
To: "'Madhusudhan'" <madhu.cr@ti.com>, <me@felipebalbi.com>,
"'kishore kadiyala'" <kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Vimal Singh'" <vimal.newwork@gmail.com>, <tony@atomide.com>,
<svenkatr@ti.com>, <linux-omap@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance.
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2010 12:43:11 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <007d01cad4e7$76076350$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <007c01cad4e4$26c5a700$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org [mailto:linux-omap-
> owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Madhusudhan
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 12:19 PM
> To: me@felipebalbi.com; 'kishore kadiyala'
> Cc: 'Vimal Singh'; tony@atomide.com; svenkatr@ti.com; linux-
> omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
> peformance.
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Felipe Balbi [mailto:me@felipebalbi.com]
> > Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:49 AM
> > To: kishore kadiyala
> > Cc: Madhusudhan; Vimal Singh; tony@atomide.com; svenkatr@ti.com; linux-
> > omap@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org;
> > jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's
> > peformance.
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 06:26:16PM +0530, kishore kadiyala wrote:
> > > @@ -2091,9 +2091,9 @@ static int __init omap_hsmmc_probe(struct
> > > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_MMC_HIGHSPEED | MMC_CAP_SD_HIGHSPEED |
> > > MMC_CAP_WAIT_WHILE_BUSY;
> > >
> > > - if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
> > > - mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> > > - else if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
> > > + if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
> > > + mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA);
> > > + else if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 4)
> > > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> >
> > I believe it would be enough to just remove the 'else', so the code
> > would look like:
> >
> > if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 8)
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA;
> > if (mmc_slot(host).wires >= 4)
>
> Since the first if command already checks for the 8-bit the second check
> like >= 4 is definitely not readable in my opinion.
>
> Functionally do you see anything wrong with this patch??
>
Just to clarify my earlier comment on the patch was to resubmit like below:
if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 8)
mmc->caps |= (MMC_CAP_8_BIT_DATA | MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA);
if (mmc_slot(host).wires == 4)
mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
IMHO, this should be good enough.
Regards,
Madhu
> > mmc->caps |= MMC_CAP_4_BIT_DATA;
> >
> > --
> > balbi
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-omap" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-05 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-11 14:20 [PATCH] OMAP: Fix for bus width which improves SD card's peformance kishore kadiyala
2010-02-11 17:34 ` Madhusudhan
2010-03-31 6:07 ` [PATCH-V2] " kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31 6:27 ` Vimal Singh
2010-03-31 7:03 ` kishore kadiyala
2010-03-31 13:11 ` Jarkko Nikula
2010-03-31 16:37 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-01 6:31 ` kishore kadiyala
2010-04-01 15:41 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 12:56 ` [PATCH v3] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-05 16:48 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-05 17:19 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-05 17:43 ` Madhusudhan [this message]
2010-04-06 5:00 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:16 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 16:32 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 16:55 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-06 16:57 ` Felipe Balbi
2010-04-06 23:23 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-06 23:39 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-07 0:16 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-07 0:57 ` Nishanth Menon
2010-04-08 16:57 ` Madhusudhan
2010-04-19 15:36 ` [PATCH v4] " kishore kadiyala
2010-04-19 15:51 ` kishore kadiyala
2010-04-22 0:26 ` Madhusudhan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='007d01cad4e7$76076350$544ff780@am.dhcp.ti.com' \
--to=madhu.cr@ti.com \
--cc=jarkko.lavinen@nokia.com \
--cc=kishorek.kadiyala@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=me@felipebalbi.com \
--cc=svenkatr@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=vimal.newwork@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).