From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id <S266155AbRF2TDF>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:03:05 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org
	id <S266156AbRF2TCz>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:02:55 -0400
Received: from www.microgate.com ([216.30.46.105]:21517 "EHLO
	sol.microgate.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id <S266155AbRF2TCk>; Fri, 29 Jun 2001 15:02:40 -0400
Message-ID: <009201c100d6$6ad50030$0c00a8c0@diemos>
From: "Paul Fulghum" <paulkf@microgate.com>
To: "Pavel Machek" <pavel@suse.cz>, <landley@webofficenow.com>,
        "Schilling, Richard" <RSchilling@affiliatedhealth.org>,
        <hps@intermeta.de>,
        "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <mailgate@hometree.net>,
        <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <51FCCCF0C130D211BE550008C724149E01165690@mail1.affiliatedhealth.org> <01062114211800.00692@localhost.localdomain> <20010629002710.C525@bug.ucw.cz>
Subject: Re: The latest Microsoft FUD. This time from BillG, himself.
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2001 14:02:25 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

> Is this accurate? I never knew NT was mach-based. I do not think NT
> 1-3 were actually ever shipped, first was NT 3.5 right?
> Pavel

NT 3.1 was the 1st to ship.

Paul Fulghum paulkf@microgate.com
Microgate Corporation www.microgate.com