public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Brien" <admin@brien.com>
To: "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: my dual channel DDR 400 RAM won't work on any linux distro
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:01:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00a801c3045b$4b6f3460$6901a8c0@athialsinp4oc1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: PEEPIDHAKMCGHDBJLHKGCEMNCHAA.rwhite@casabyte.com

>but I suspect it has to do with
> tolerances, timing, and evil gremlins that live under SIMMs and exact a
toll
> on non-union data

darn those gremlins! have any repellent?

(sorry if this seems like junk to some people--not going to make it a habit)

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert White" <rwhite@casabyte.com>
To: "Brien" <admin@brien.com>; <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: my dual channel DDR 400 RAM won't work on any linux distro


> I had one-hell of a problem myself relating to memory on my new cutting
edge
> motherboard.  The problem, it turned out, had everything to do with the
> motherboard and the often marginal quality of the ram.  Much investigation
> revealed that there were only a few manufacturers of ram that the MoBoard
> would "support"
>
> In lay speak, I could put any damn thing I wanted into the first slot, but
> anything I did with the second and subsequent slots went all haywire.
>
> The BS layman's speak they gave me at the store was that they had seen a
lot
> of cases where having "double sided SIMMs" (they were oh-so-usefully
> classifying the memory based on whether there were chips on just one side,
> or on both sides of the circuit card 8-) in the second and subsequent
slots
> never worked.
>
> Translating that somewhat vague set of observations by less than top-shelf
> observers, and the really scavenging across the manufacturer site where
they
> listed the specific manufacturer and model numbers of supported SIMs which
> were only compatible in specific sets.  (e.g. two of "these" or three of
> "those" with no mix-and-match.)  This netted me the following wisdom:
>
> 1) Mother Board claims of "up to N gig" are highly contingent.
> 2) It is nearly impossible to find those contingencies.
> 3) That is especially true before purchase.
> 4) The conformant products were all high end components.
>
> This further suggests:
>
> 5) Manufacturers are not being completely scrupulous WRT Standards
> conformance.
> 6) Retailers are not well educated about the limits induced by #5.
> 7) If you want a given amount of memory, make sure you get it all on one
> SIMM, on in a matched set, or pre-installed by someone who has the
resources
> to match a set for you.
>
> 8) Individual experience varies *WIDELY* even with the same brand and
model
> of MoBoard and SIMM.
>
> 9) <sarcasm> This is probably a plot to force people to buy the
over-priced
> 1Gig SIMMs instead of a pair of reasonably priced 512K SIMMs </sarcasm>
>
> I don't know the "real cause"(tm) but I suspect it has to do with
> tolerances, timing, and evil gremlins that live under SIMMs and exact a
toll
> on non-union data.  At these speeds 1-half of one percent error can exceed
> the noise-floor almost immediately.
>
> Rob.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org]On Behalf Of Brien
> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 7:59 AM
> To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: my dual channel DDR 400 RAM won't work on any linux distro
>
>
> (I posted this on some forums and they recommended that I try here)
>
> Hi,
>
> I have a Gigabyte SINXP1394 motherboard, and 2 Kingston 512 MB DDR 400 (CL
> 2.5) RAM modules installed. Whenever I try to install any Linux
> distribution, I always get a black screen after the kernel loads, when I
> have dual channel enabled; If I take out 1 of the RAM modules (either
one),
> everything works as it should -- it's not a bad module (works perfectly
> under Windows by the way). I can't disable dual channel without taking out
> half of my RAM, and I really do not want to run with only half of it. Does
> anyone have any idea how I can fix this problem, or is it something that
> needs to be updated in the kernel?
>
> Thanks for any info.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
>



  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-16 20:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-16 14:59 my dual channel DDR 400 RAM won't work on any linux distro Brien
2003-04-16 16:51 ` Bruce Harada
2003-04-16 20:53 ` Robert White
2003-04-16 21:01   ` Brien [this message]
2003-04-16 22:05   ` root
2003-04-17  1:16     ` Mike Dresser
2003-04-17  5:34   ` Peter Svensson
     [not found] <200304161511.h3GFBoe7000614@81-2-122-30.bradfords.org.uk>
2003-04-16 15:41 ` Brien
2003-04-16 15:47   ` Mr. James W. Laferriere
2003-04-16 15:58   ` Charles Cazabon
2003-04-16 16:10   ` Chris Friesen
2003-04-17 12:46     ` mbs
2003-04-17 12:45       ` Alan Cox
     [not found]   ` <1050506129.28586.121.camel@dhcp22.swansea.linux.org.uk>
2003-04-16 16:38     ` Brien
2003-04-16 17:01       ` John Bradford
2003-04-16 18:15         ` Brien
2003-04-16 19:28           ` John Bradford
2003-04-16 20:51             ` Brien
2003-04-17  8:12               ` John Bradford
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-04-20 16:58 Walt H

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00a801c3045b$4b6f3460$6901a8c0@athialsinp4oc1' \
    --to=admin@brien.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rwhite@casabyte.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox