From: Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>
To: Guangguan Wang <guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Karsten Graul <kgraul@linux.ibm.com>,
liuyacan@corp.netease.com, kuba@kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: align the connect behaviour with TCP
Date: Fri, 1 Jul 2022 14:45:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00aeafda-ed23-1066-c0b0-d8fb7f8ec2d2@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3e801eb5-6305-aa87-43a6-98f591d7d55c@linux.alibaba.com>
On 01.07.22 04:03, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2022/7/1 04:16, Wenjia Zhang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 30.06.22 16:29, Guangguan Wang wrote:
>>> I'm so sorry I missed the last emails for this discussion.
>>>
>>> Yes, commit (86434744) is the trigger of the problem described in
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/45a19f8b-1b64-3459-c28c-aebab4fd8f1e@linux.alibaba.com/#t .
>>>
>>> And I have tested just remove the following lines from smc_connection() can solve the above problem.
>>> if (smc->use_fallback)
>>> goto out;
>>>
>>> I aggree that partly reverting the commit (86434744) is a better solution.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Guangguan Wang
>> Thank you for your effort!
>> Would you like to revert this patch? We'll revert the commit (86434744) partly.
>
> Did you mean revert commit (3aba1030)?
> Sorry, I think I led to a misunderstanding. I mean commit (86434744) is the trigger of the problem I replied
> in email https://lore.kernel.org/linux-s390/45a19f8b-1b64-3459-c28c-aebab4fd8f1e@linux.alibaba.com/#t, not
> the problem that commit (3aba1030) resolved for.
>
> So I think the final solution is to remove the following lines from smc_connection() based on the current code.
> if (smc->use_fallback) {
> sock->state = rc ? SS_CONNECTING : SS_CONNECTED;
> goto out;
> }
>
> Thanks,
> Guangguan Wang
That would be also ok for us, thanks!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-07-01 12:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-13 2:24 [PATCH net-next v2] net/smc: align the connect behaviour with TCP Guangguan Wang
2022-05-16 9:50 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2022-05-23 12:24 ` Karsten Graul
2022-05-24 2:59 ` Guangguan Wang
2022-05-24 12:04 ` Karsten Graul
2022-05-24 12:57 ` liuyacan
2022-05-24 13:05 ` Karsten Graul
2022-06-29 20:29 ` Wenjia Zhang
[not found] ` <8a15e288-4534-501c-8b3d-c235ae93238f@linux.ibm.com>
2022-06-30 14:29 ` Guangguan Wang
2022-06-30 20:16 ` Wenjia Zhang
2022-07-01 2:03 ` Guangguan Wang
2022-07-01 12:45 ` Wenjia Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00aeafda-ed23-1066-c0b0-d8fb7f8ec2d2@linux.ibm.com \
--to=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=guangguan.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=kgraul@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuyacan@corp.netease.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox