From: Kukjin Kim <kgene@kernel.org>
To: "'Krzysztof Kozlowski'" <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>,
"'Viresh Kumar'" <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
"'Kukjin Kim'" <kgene@kernel.org>
Cc: "'Jonas Rabenstein'" <jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de>,
"'Rafael J. Wysocki'" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 22:01:23 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00c701d0d5c8$28186fd0$78494f70$@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJKOXPcxk3J0vmczJ7eOtUhzKxQW0Za0ZmgUAdX=jiT+eRxyKw@mail.gmail.com>
Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>
> 2015-08-13 20:33 GMT+09:00 Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>:
> > On 13-08-15, 13:28, Jonas Rabenstein wrote:
> >> Commit "cpufreq: exynos: remove Exynos4x12 specific cpufreq driver
> >> support" deleted option ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ but missed to delete a rule
> >> in drivers/cpufreq/Makefile which depends on that option.
> >>
> >> Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o from
> >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jonas Rabenstein <jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de>
> >> ---
> >> I found this inconsistency using the undertaker and
> >> undertaker-checkpatch tools (https://undertaker.cs.fau.de/).
> >>
> >> drivers/cpufreq/Makefile | 1 -
> >> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> >> index bbc4a9f..958be2b 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> >> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/Makefile
> >> @@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_DT_BL_CPUFREQ) += arm_big_little_dt.o
> >>
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DAVINCI) += davinci-cpufreq.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_UX500_SOC_DB8500) += dbx500-cpufreq.o
> >> -obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS_CPUFREQ) += arm-exynos-cpufreq.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_EXYNOS5440_CPUFREQ) += exynos5440-cpufreq.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HIGHBANK_CPUFREQ) += highbank-cpufreq.o
> >> obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_HISI_ACPU_CPUFREQ) += hisi-acpu-cpufreq.o
> >
> > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
>
> And again from me:
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com>
>
> Dear Kukjin,
> Can you take it and send in (updated) pull request with Exynos4x12
> cpufreq patches?
>
OK, sure. I'll take this.
Thanks,
Kukjin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-13 13:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-13 10:32 [PATCH] Remove unselectable rule for arm-exynos-cpufreq.o Jonas Rabenstein
2015-08-13 10:35 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-13 10:53 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-13 10:58 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-13 11:28 ` [PATCH v2] " Jonas Rabenstein
2015-08-13 11:33 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-08-13 11:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2015-08-13 13:01 ` Kukjin Kim [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00c701d0d5c8$28186fd0$78494f70$@kernel.org' \
--to=kgene@kernel.org \
--cc=jonas.rabenstein@studium.uni-erlangen.de \
--cc=k.kozlowski@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox