From: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
To: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 15:21:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00d4a5fe-2a9d-41c6-8f40-df657fd277d8@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b8b9a7d2-6b1c-4cb1-a41e-55a2e31c25f5@ti.com>
On 20/02/24 23:05, Judith Mendez wrote:
> Hi Adrian,
>
> On 2/16/24 11:09 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>> On 7/02/24 03:15, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>> For DDR52 timing, DLL is enabled but tuning is not carried
>>> out, therefore the ITAPDLY value in PHY CTRL 4 register is
>>> not correct. Fix this by writing ITAPDLY after enabling DLL.
>>>
>>> Fixes: a161c45f2979 ("mmc: sdhci_am654: Enable DLL only for some speed modes")
>>
>> Note that the Fixes tags make a different ordering
>> than the patch order i.e.
>>
>> Patch Fixes in version
>> 1 13ebeae68ac9 v5.10-rc1
>> 2 a161c45f2979 v5.7-rc1
>> 3 8ee5fc0e0b3b v5.7-rc1
>> 4 8ee5fc0e0b3b v5.7-rc1
>> 4 a0a62497f6aa v5.10-rc1
>> 5 fe52e2fbc6ef v5.9-rc1
>> 6 1accbced1c32 v5.3-rc1
>> 7 a161c45f2979 v5.7-rc1
>>
>> That might make backporting these patches more challenging.
>
> Are you suggesting to remove the fixes tag here?
No, it is just something to think about if you intend to
backport these patches to older kernels.
>
>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changelog:
>>> v1->v2:
>>> - Call sdhci_am654_write_itapdly() in sdhci_am654_set_clock()
>>> instead of sdhci_am654_setup_dll()
>>> ---
>>> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> index 2c66a965c225..b50db5d4a452 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci_am654.c
>>> @@ -299,6 +299,7 @@ static void sdhci_am654_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
>>> if (timing > MMC_TIMING_UHS_SDR25 && clock >= CLOCK_TOO_SLOW_HZ) {
>>> sdhci_am654_setup_dll(host, clock);
>>> + sdhci_am654_write_itapdly(sdhci_am654, sdhci_am654->itap_del_sel[timing]);
>>> sdhci_am654->dll_enable = true;
>>> } else {
>>> sdhci_am654_setup_delay_chain(sdhci_am654, timing);
>>
>
> ~ Judith
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-28 13:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-07 1:15 [PATCH v2 0/7] Add tuning algorithm for delay chain Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: " Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:10 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-28 13:21 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-28 15:38 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Write ITAPDLY for DDR52 timing Judith Mendez
2024-02-12 17:13 ` Andrew Davis
2024-02-12 17:33 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:09 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 21:05 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-28 13:21 ` Adrian Hunter [this message]
2024-02-28 15:40 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add missing OTAP/ITAP enable Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix itapdly/otapdly array type Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:10 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:14 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Update comments in sdhci_am654_set_clock Judith Mendez
2024-02-16 17:11 ` Adrian Hunter
2024-02-20 20:14 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Add ITAPDLYSEL in sdhci_j721e_4bit_set_clock Judith Mendez
2024-02-07 1:15 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mmc: sdhci_am654: Fix ITAPDLY for HS400 timing Judith Mendez
2024-02-11 16:02 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Add tuning algorithm for delay chain Francesco Dolcini
2024-02-12 16:33 ` Judith Mendez
2024-02-12 17:32 ` Francesco Dolcini
2024-02-12 17:56 ` Judith Mendez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=00d4a5fe-2a9d-41c6-8f40-df657fd277d8@intel.com \
--to=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=jm@ti.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox