From: "Paul Rolland" <rol@as2917.net>
To: "'Andrew Walrond'" <andrew@walrond.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......
Date: Sun, 29 Dec 2002 23:06:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <00d901c2af86$8be90d60$2101a8c0@witbe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3E0F63FD.60903@walrond.org>
Well, I did made another kernel without ACPI and with APM,
and it is working fine.
To summarize :
- ACPI Enumeration only is fine
- More functionnalities from ACPI is bad.
If someone has an idea and wants me to make tests, please contact
me...
Regards,
Paul
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
> [mailto:linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org] On Behalf Of
> Andrew Walrond
> Sent: Sunday, December 29, 2002 10:07 PM
> To: Paul Rolland
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [2.5.53] So sloowwwww......
>
>
> Mount a tmpfs drive and try building the kernel there to rule
> out scsi
> or disc issues. (You've got .5Gb I think? Might not want to
> run kde as
> well; just build from a console)
>
> But I think your ACPI guess is probably not far wrong.
>
> Paul Rolland wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >>Ouch; that is slow. What partition type are you building from ?
> >>
> >
> > This is an ext3 partition, and a SCSI disk :
> > 4 [18:10] rol@donald:/kernels> df .
> > Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> > /dev/sda1 10320888 753828 9042724 8% /kernels
> >
> > Do you think I should try on some other ?
> > The problem is that the system is *globally* slow, and
> compiling the
> > kernel is just a way to prove it. Starting KDE has become a
> real pain
> > (so slow screen detects no more video and enter Energy Saving mode
> > before reactivating and switching to Graphic mode).
> >
> > Regards,
> > Paul
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
> majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-29 21:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-29 15:29 [2.5.53] So sloowwwww Paul Rolland
2002-12-29 16:56 ` Andrew Walrond
2002-12-29 17:12 ` Paul Rolland
2002-12-29 21:07 ` Andrew Walrond
2002-12-29 22:06 ` Paul Rolland [this message]
2002-12-29 17:30 ` John Stoffel
2002-12-29 17:36 ` Paul Rolland
2002-12-30 13:16 ` venom
2002-12-29 18:55 ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-29 19:16 ` Paul Rolland
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-29 17:12 rwhron
2002-12-29 17:13 ` Paul Rolland
2002-12-29 17:47 Manfred Spraul
2002-12-29 17:54 ` John Bradford
2002-12-29 18:18 ` Paul Rolland
2002-12-29 18:22 Hell.Surfers
[not found] <fa.el8u04v.1jks783@ifi.uio.no>
[not found] ` <fa.f29f77v.on2i97@ifi.uio.no>
2003-01-02 7:26 ` Andrew S. Johnson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='00d901c2af86$8be90d60$2101a8c0@witbe' \
--to=rol@as2917.net \
--cc=andrew@walrond.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox