public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rob Mueller" <robm@fastmail.fm>
To: "Chris Mason" <mason@suse.com>
Cc: <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Processes stuck in unkillable D state (2.4 and 2.6)
Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:07:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <00df01c45ec4$b8d08210$62afc742@ROBMHP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1088614262.1589.1395.camel@watt.suse.com


> Well, you've got two procs waiting for pages but it isn't entirely clear
> why they aren't getting them.  There have been quite a few fixes in this
> area since 2.6.4, how hard is it for you to upgrade?

We can upgrade, and probably will soon. It was just that this problem has 
been occuring for a long time (as I mentioned, since 2.4.18) and this is the 
first time I'd managed to capture some sysreq-t output for this problem, and 
I thought that the infornation might be in some way immediately useful. 
Given that it's stuck in io_schedule, and the long term nature of the 
problem, does that suggest a hardware/device driver issue maybe? It just 
surprised me that the backtrace for both procs showed they got stuck going 
through the exact same code path, wasn't sure if it was a coincidence or a 
sign of something definitely going funny in that code path.

Anyway, we're currently doing some stress tests, and will probably upgrade 
in the next week or two to a newer kernel. I'll see what happens then.

Rob


  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-30 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-29 14:39 Processes stuck in unkillable D state (2.4 and 2.6) Rob Mueller
2004-06-30 14:12 ` Chris Mason
2004-06-30 14:58   ` Rob Mueller
2004-06-30 16:51     ` Chris Mason
2004-06-30 17:07       ` Rob Mueller [this message]
2004-07-04 17:39       ` Marcelo Tosatti
2004-07-05  0:34         ` Processes stuck in unkillable D state (2.4 and 2.6)\ Marcelo Tosatti

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='00df01c45ec4$b8d08210$62afc742@ROBMHP' \
    --to=robm@fastmail.fm \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mason@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox