From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:53:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:53:40 -0400 Received: from 7ka-campus-gw.mipt.ru ([194.85.83.97]:6667 "EHLO 7ka-campus-gw.mipt.ru") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 25 Jun 2001 07:53:31 -0400 Message-ID: <00e001c0fd6d$6bf42980$d55355c2@microsoft> From: "Alexander V. Bilichenko" To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Tomasz_K=B3oczko?= Cc: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code! Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2001 15:53:17 +0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2488.0001 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2488.0001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Here is link to Intel C compiler, that provide really faster code. http://developer.intel.com/software/products/compilers/linuxbeta.htm ----- Original Message ----- From: "Tomasz Kłoczko" To: "Alexander V. Bilichenko" Sent: Monday, June 25, 2001 3:40 PM Subject: Re: GCC3.0 Produce REALLY slower code! > On Mon, 25 Jun 2001, Alexander V. Bilichenko wrote: > > > Although I just wanna say that there is no reason trying compile kernel with > > new shiny GCC 3.0 ;-). The result will be in kernel slowdown. > > > > Maybe, we can try to use Intel C compiler for some important ;-) (beta > > version work with linux). > > Is there avalaible any free/evaluation version this compiler ? > > kloczek > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------- > *Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają* > ----------------------------------------------------------- > Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl* >