From: Robert Kaiser <rob@sysgo.de>
To: Brian Gerst <bgerst@didntduck.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ?
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 23:17:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01010923324500.02850@rob> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01010922090000.02630@rob> <01010922264400.02737@rob> <3A5B86C1.41DDB11B@didntduck.org>
In-Reply-To: <3A5B86C1.41DDB11B@didntduck.org>
On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote:
> Robert Kaiser wrote:
> >
> > On Die, 09 Jan 2001 you wrote:
> > > Robert Kaiser wrote:
> > > > I can't seem to get the new 2.4.0 kernel running on a 386 CPU.
> > > > The kernel was built for a 386 Processor, Math emulation has been enabled.
> > > > I tried three different 386 boards. Execution seems to get as far as
> > > > pagetable_init() in arch/i386/mm/init.c, then it falls back into the BIOS as
> > > > if someone had pressed the reset button. The same kernel boots fine on
> > > > 486 and Pentium Systems.
> > ..... The last thing I see is
> > "Uncompressing Linux... Ok, booting the kernel." I have added some
> > quick and dirty debug code that writes messages directly to the VGA
> > screen buffer. According to that, execution seems to get as far as the
> > statement
> >
> > *pte = mk_pte_phys(__pa(vaddr), PAGE_KERNEL);
> >
>
> Could it be possible that memory size is being misdetected? Try mem=8M
> (or less) on the command line. Try to catch the value of pte when it
> crashes.
I tried "mem=4M" -- no effect. The value of pte is 0xc0001000, so it seems
to be the first invocation of that statement in the for() loop.
Now comes the amazing (to me) part: I split the above statement up into:
temp = mk_pte_phys(__pa(vaddr), PAGE_KERNEL);
*pte = temp;
where temp is declared "volatile pte_t". I inserted test-prints between the
above two lines. Accoding to that, the _first_ line , i.e. the evaluation of the
mk_pte_phys() macro is causing the crash!
I am still trying to figure out what mk_pte_phys() does. Apparently it involves
an access to the kernel's data section. My current guess is that the data
section is not correctly mapped at this point. Would that be possible ?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Robert Kaiser email: rkaiser@sysgo.de
SYSGO RTS GmbH
Am Pfaffenstein 14 phone: (49) 6136 9948-762
D-55270 Klein-Winternheim / Germany fax: (49) 6136 9948-10
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-09 22:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-09 20:53 Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:15 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 21:17 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 21:46 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 22:17 ` Robert Kaiser [this message]
2001-01-09 22:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-09 23:44 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 0:19 ` Alex Buell
2001-01-10 0:20 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 0:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-01-10 16:00 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:29 ` Tom G. Christensen
2001-01-10 22:04 ` X performance on 2.4.0 v.s. 2.4.0-test12 Alan Olsen
2001-01-09 23:03 ` Anybody got 2.4.0 running on a 386 ? Brian Gerst
2001-01-09 23:04 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-09 23:28 ` Anuradha Ratnaweera
2001-01-09 23:42 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 1:48 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 15:25 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 21:04 ` Miles Lane
2001-01-10 16:28 ` Paul Gortmaker
2001-01-15 18:38 ` [SOLVED + PATCH] " Robert Kaiser
2001-01-15 19:11 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-01-09 22:44 ` Timur Tabi
2001-01-09 21:59 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 19:51 ` mo6
2001-01-10 20:18 ` Brian Gerst
2001-01-10 21:53 ` mo6
2001-01-11 12:20 ` mo6
2001-01-10 3:53 ` Tom Leete
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-10 9:25 richardj_moore
2001-01-10 14:19 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 15:04 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 15:49 ` Alan Cox
2001-01-10 16:02 ` Robert Kaiser
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.04.10101101000130.27018-100000@hantana.pdn.ac.lk>
2001-01-10 15:37 ` Robert Kaiser
2001-01-10 17:16 Petr Vandrovec
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01010923324500.02850@rob \
--to=rob@sysgo.de \
--cc=bgerst@didntduck.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox