From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:40:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:40:19 -0500 Received: from paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de ([62.159.219.13]:51147 "HELO paloma13.e0k.nbg-hannover.de") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:40:05 -0500 From: Dieter Nützel Organization: DN To: "Linus Torvalds" Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric? Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:43:52 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Jens Axboe , Andrea Arcangeli , "Linux Kernel List" MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01012904435200.00697@SunWave1> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix. high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3; low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2; if (low_queued_sectors < 0) low_queued_sectors = total_ram / 2; /* * for big RAM machines (>= 384MB), use more for I/O */ /* if (total_ram >= MB(384)) { high_queued_sectors = (total_ram * 4) / 5; low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors - MB(128); } */ Shouldn't it be clean for a 2.4.1 release? -Dieter - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/