public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dieter Nützel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
	Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:01:09 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01012905010901.00697@SunWave1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01012904435200.00697@SunWave1> <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>

Am Montag, 29. Januar 2001 04:46 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix.
> >
> >         high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3;
> >         low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2;
> >         if (low_queued_sectors < 0)
> >                 low_queued_sectors = total_ram / 2;
> >
> >         /*
> >          * for big RAM machines (>= 384MB), use more for I/O
> >          */
> >         /*
> >         if (total_ram >= MB(384)) {
> >                 high_queued_sectors = (total_ram * 4) / 5;
> >                 low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors - MB(128);
> >         }
> >         */
> >
> > Shouldn't it be clean for a 2.4.1 release?
>
> With enough swap the numbers I saw were not conclusive. I promised
> to test which I haven't gotten done yet, I will do this tomorrow
> and make sure we have the right ratios. However, I don't think
> the pre11 numbers are much off - do you have any results?

I have 256 MB RAM and 200 MB swap but nothing of the later was used during 
"dbench 48". It was nothing spectacular but a litte bit faster with the above.
Attention: Results only from memory...;-)

Good night.
	Dieter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2001-01-29  3:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-01-29  3:43 Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric? Dieter Nützel
2001-01-29  3:46 ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-29  4:01   ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-29 11:56 Petr Vandrovec
2001-01-29 15:12 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01012905010901.00697@SunWave1 \
    --to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
    --cc=andrea@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox