From: Dieter Nützel <Dieter.Nuetzel@hamburg.de>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <andrea@suse.de>,
Linux Kernel List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:01:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01012905010901.00697@SunWave1> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <01012904435200.00697@SunWave1> <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>
In-Reply-To: <20010129044640.B15679@suse.de>
Am Montag, 29. Januar 2001 04:46 schrieb Jens Axboe:
> On Mon, Jan 29 2001, Dieter Nützel wrote:
> > I have pre11 running with Andrea's suggested fix.
> >
> > high_queued_sectors = total_ram / 3;
> > low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors / 2;
> > if (low_queued_sectors < 0)
> > low_queued_sectors = total_ram / 2;
> >
> > /*
> > * for big RAM machines (>= 384MB), use more for I/O
> > */
> > /*
> > if (total_ram >= MB(384)) {
> > high_queued_sectors = (total_ram * 4) / 5;
> > low_queued_sectors = high_queued_sectors - MB(128);
> > }
> > */
> >
> > Shouldn't it be clean for a 2.4.1 release?
>
> With enough swap the numbers I saw were not conclusive. I promised
> to test which I haven't gotten done yet, I will do this tomorrow
> and make sure we have the right ratios. However, I don't think
> the pre11 numbers are much off - do you have any results?
I have 256 MB RAM and 200 MB swap but nothing of the later was used during
"dbench 48". It was nothing spectacular but a litte bit faster with the above.
Attention: Results only from memory...;-)
Good night.
Dieter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-29 3:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-29 3:43 Linux-2.4.1-pre11 / ll_rw_b watermark metric? Dieter Nützel
2001-01-29 3:46 ` Jens Axboe
2001-01-29 4:01 ` Dieter Nützel [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-01-29 11:56 Petr Vandrovec
2001-01-29 15:12 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01012905010901.00697@SunWave1 \
--to=dieter.nuetzel@hamburg.de \
--cc=andrea@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox