From: Ashwin D <ashwinds@yahoo.com> (by way of Ashwin D <ashwinds@yahoo.com>)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug in 2.4.x??
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:38:18 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01021409381901.00688@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2076 bytes --]
Hi
Well, it may not be a bug, but it sure is bugging me - i have been on this
for more than a week. Well, here goes;
Why is it that my DMA performance under the kernel 2.4.x is worse than the
one under 2.2? I have attached the stats below the mail- information and test
results under both kernels.
I use the following option under rc.local to set dma ;
/sbin/hdparm -c1 -d1 -m16 -X66 /dev/hda
I use resierfs, Iam disappointed that 2.4 results are about 1/3rd and need to
know what to do.
I use a i810 mobo and seagate 8.4 gb hdd
I have tried recompiling the kernel - iam informed a broken .config could
have caused this, but no change.
I have tried random settings with hdparm to tune /dev/hda.
Thanks for your time.
Ashwin
(Iam not on the list yet, so please cc me personally)
-------------------------
TEST RESULTS
___________________________
a) Kernel 2.2.17 (mandrake)
(i) hdpartm -i:
/dev/hda:
Model=ST38420A, FwRev=3.07, SerialNo=7AZ0PTZT
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=512kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=16841664
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2
(ii) hdpartm -t:
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.38 seconds = 14.61 MB/sec
b) Kernel 2.4.1 (linux )
(i) hdparm -i
/dev/hda:
Model=ST38420A, FwRev=3.07, SerialNo=7AZ0PTZT
Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=512kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=16841664
IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2
(ii) hdparm -t
/dev/hda:
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 11.61 seconds = 5.51 MB/sec
next reply other threads:[~2001-02-14 4:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-02-14 4:08 Ashwin D [this message]
2001-02-14 21:28 ` Bug in 2.4.x?? Eugene Danilchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01021409381901.00688@localhost.localdomain \
--to=ashwinds@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox