public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ashwin D <ashwinds@yahoo.com> (by way of Ashwin D <ashwinds@yahoo.com>)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug in 2.4.x??
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:38:18 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01021409381901.00688@localhost.localdomain> (raw)

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2076 bytes --]

Hi

Well, it may not be a bug, but it sure is bugging me - i have been on this 
for more than a week. Well, here goes; 

Why is it that my DMA performance under the kernel 2.4.x is worse than the
one under 2.2? I have attached the stats below the mail- information and test
results under both kernels.

I use the following option under rc.local to set dma ;
         /sbin/hdparm -c1 -d1 -m16 -X66 /dev/hda

I use resierfs, Iam disappointed that 2.4 results are about 1/3rd and need to
know what to do.

I use a i810 mobo and seagate 8.4 gb hdd

I have tried recompiling the kernel - iam informed a broken .config could 
have caused this, but no change. 
I have tried random settings with hdparm to tune /dev/hda.

Thanks for your time.
Ashwin
(Iam not on the list yet, so please cc me personally) 

-------------------------
TEST RESULTS
___________________________

a) Kernel 2.2.17 (mandrake)

(i) hdpartm -i:
/dev/hda:

 Model=ST38420A, FwRev=3.07, SerialNo=7AZ0PTZT
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=512kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=16841664
 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
 PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2

(ii) hdpartm -t:
/dev/hda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in  4.38 seconds = 14.61 MB/sec


b) Kernel 2.4.1 (linux )

(i) hdparm -i
/dev/hda:

 Model=ST38420A, FwRev=3.07, SerialNo=7AZ0PTZT
 Config={ HardSect NotMFM HdSw>15uSec Fixed DTR>10Mbs RotSpdTol>.5% }
 RawCHS=16383/16/63, TrkSize=0, SectSize=0, ECCbytes=0
 BuffType=unknown, BuffSize=512kB, MaxMultSect=16, MultSect=16
 CurCHS=16383/16/63, CurSects=16514064, LBA=yes, LBAsects=16841664
 IORDY=on/off, tPIO={min:240,w/IORDY:120}, tDMA={min:120,rec:120}
 PIO modes: pio0 pio1 pio2 pio3 pio4
 DMA modes: mdma0 mdma1 mdma2 udma0 udma1 *udma2

(ii) hdparm -t

/dev/hda:
 Timing buffered disk reads:  64 MB in 11.61 seconds =  5.51 MB/sec

             reply	other threads:[~2001-02-14  4:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-02-14  4:08 Ashwin D [this message]
2001-02-14 21:28 ` Bug in 2.4.x?? Eugene Danilchenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01021409381901.00688@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=ashwinds@yahoo.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox