From: Andreas Peter <ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Ide performance (was RAID0 Performance problems)
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:08:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01041521080401.00510@debian> (raw)
Hi,
I've posted about performance problems with my RAID0 setup.
RAID works fine, but it's too slow.
But now it seems not to be a problem with the md code, it's an ide problem.
There are two HDs in my PC: /dev/hda and /dev/hdc. No other devices are
attached to the ide-bus.
PC is a SMP-System, 2 Celeron 533, Gigabyte 6BXDS with Intel BX-Chipset,
66MHz FSB.
The hdparm settings:
bash-2.04# hdparm /dev/hda /dev/hdc
/dev/hda:
multcount = 0 (off)
I/O support = 3 (32-bit w/sync)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
nowerr = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 0 (off)
geometry = 59556/16/63, sectors = 60032448, start = 0
/dev/hdc:
multcount = 0 (off)
I/O support = 3 (32-bit w/sync)
unmaskirq = 1 (on)
using_dma = 1 (on)
keepsettings = 0 (off)
nowerr = 0 (off)
readonly = 0 (off)
readahead = 0 (off)
geometry = 59556/16/63, sectors = 60032448, start = 0
I've tested a lot of variations of this settings (multcount=16,
unmaskirq=0...) without succes.
The performance of the RAID doesn't increase :-(
hdparm -tT on a single HD (dev/hda3 is the RAID-partition) reports a very
good performance:
bash-2.04# hdparm -tT /dev/hda3
/dev/hda3:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.42 seconds = 90.14 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 2.27 seconds = 28.19 MB/sec
But if I start 2 hdparms simultanous (one on /dev/hda3 the other on
/dev/hdc3) the performance on the HDs decreases to 1/2 of the original speed:
bash-2.04# hdparm -tT /dev/hda3
/dev/hda3:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 2.27 seconds = 56.39 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.56 seconds = 14.04 MB/sec
bash-2.04# hdparm -tT /dev/hdc3
/dev/hdc3:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 2.25 seconds = 56.89 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 4.49 seconds = 14.25 MB/sec
The performance of the RAID0:
bash-2.04# hdparm -tT /dev/md0
/dev/md0:
Timing buffer-cache reads: 128 MB in 1.35 seconds = 94.81 MB/sec
Timing buffered disk reads: 64 MB in 3.11 seconds = 20.58 MB/sec
Tests with bonnie or iozone have the same reuslts, RAID is slower then a
single HD :-(
Does anybody has an idea what's wrong with my setup??
Thx,
Andreas
--
Andreas Peter *** ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de
next reply other threads:[~2001-04-15 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-04-15 19:08 Andreas Peter [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-04-17 9:57 Ide performance (was RAID0 Performance problems) Philippe Amelant
2001-04-17 21:50 Phil
2001-04-17 23:15 ` Jakob Østergaard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01041521080401.00510@debian \
--to=ujq7@rz.uni-karlsruhe.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox