From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] x86/mce: Pay no attention to 'F' bit in MCACOD when parsing 'UC' errors.
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2013 13:34:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0104420@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com> (raw)
The 0x1000 bit of the MCACOD field of machine check MCi_STATUS
registers is only defined for corrected errors (where it means
that hardware may be filtering errors see SDM section 15.9.2.1).
For uncorrected errors it may, or may not be set - so we should mask
it out when checking for the architecturaly defined recoverable
error signatures (see SDM 15.9.3.1 and 15.9.3.2)
While fixing this - I also noticed a bug introduced by
commit 33d7885b594e169256daef652e8d3527b2298e75
x86/mce: Update MCE severity condition check
where we were including MCACOD bits in the check for the
unaffected thread(s) during a machine check.
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h | 3 ++-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c | 8 ++++----
2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
index fa5f71e..a528f28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/mce.h
@@ -33,10 +33,11 @@
#define MCI_STATUS_S (1ULL<<56) /* Signaled machine check */
#define MCI_STATUS_AR (1ULL<<55) /* Action required */
#define MCACOD 0xffff /* MCA Error Code */
+#define MCACOD_UC 0xefff /* MCA Error Code - for UC errors */
/* Architecturally defined codes from SDM Vol. 3B Chapter 15 */
#define MCACOD_SCRUB 0x00C0 /* 0xC0-0xCF Memory Scrubbing */
-#define MCACOD_SCRUBMSK 0xfff0
+#define MCACOD_SCRUBMSK 0xeff0
#define MCACOD_L3WB 0x017A /* L3 Explicit Writeback */
#define MCACOD_DATA 0x0134 /* Data Load */
#define MCACOD_INSTR 0x0150 /* Instruction Fetch */
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
index e2703520..7f6ab4e 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/mcheck/mce-severity.c
@@ -111,17 +111,17 @@ static struct severity {
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_FAILURE
MCESEV(
KEEP, "Action required but unaffected thread is continuable",
- SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR),
+ SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR),
MCGMASK(MCG_STATUS_RIPV, MCG_STATUS_RIPV)
),
MCESEV(
AR, "Action required: data load error in a user process",
- SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_DATA),
+ SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_UC, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_DATA),
USER
),
MCESEV(
AR, "Action required: instruction fetch error in a user process",
- SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_INSTR),
+ SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_UC, MCI_UC_SAR|MCI_ADDR|MCACOD_INSTR),
USER
),
#endif
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ static struct severity {
),
MCESEV(
AO, "Action optional: last level cache writeback error",
- SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCACOD, MCI_UC_S|MCACOD_L3WB)
+ SER, MASK(MCI_STATUS_OVER|MCI_UC_SAR|MCACOD_UC, MCI_UC_S|MCACOD_L3WB)
),
MCESEV(
SOME, "Action optional: unknown MCACOD",
--
1.8.1.4
next reply other threads:[~2013-07-23 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-07-23 20:34 Luck, Tony [this message]
2013-07-23 22:51 ` [PATCH] x86/mce: Pay no attention to 'F' bit in MCACOD when parsing 'UC' errors Tony Luck
2013-07-24 6:16 ` Chen Gong
2013-07-25 10:38 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-25 18:01 ` Luck, Tony
2013-07-31 10:06 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-24 6:19 ` Chen Gong
2013-07-24 15:55 ` Naveen N. Rao
2013-07-24 17:00 ` Luck, Tony
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0104420@agluck-desk.sc.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=gong.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox