From: Oliver Neukum <Oliver.Neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de>
To: Erik Hensema <erik@hensema.xs4all.nl>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Meaning of major kernel version number
Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 23:01:11 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <01050123011105.04685@idun> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20010501224943.A21208@hensema.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20010501224943.A21208@hensema.xs4all.nl>
On Tuesday, 1. May 2001 22:49, Erik Hensema wrote:
> Hi,
>
> A little question which may be a FAQ: what does the major version number
> [1] of the Linux kernel (still) mean? What is the policy on increasing the
> major version (eg. on what basis it is decided the next kernel isn't going
> to be 2.6 but 3.0)?
Our great fearless leader will talk with the penguin beyond the sky.
HTH
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-01 21:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-01 20:49 Meaning of major kernel version number Erik Hensema
2001-05-01 21:01 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2001-05-01 23:59 ` george anzinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=01050123011105.04685@idun \
--to=oliver.neukum@lrz.uni-muenchen.de \
--cc=erik@hensema.xs4all.nl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox