From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 14:54:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 14:53:59 -0400 Received: from bugs.unl.edu.ar ([168.96.132.208]:35497 "HELO bugs.unl.edu.ar") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Thu, 10 May 2001 14:53:43 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Mart=EDn=20Marqu=E9s?= To: Joel Jaeggli Subject: Re: reiserfs, xfs, ext2, ext3 Date: Thu, 10 May 2001 15:54:11 +0300 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051015541100.02231@bugs> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mié 09 May 2001 21:32, Joel Jaeggli wrote: > I have a proxy server that's been running 2.4.3pre4 with reiserfs for the > partitions on the cache disks. it has an uptime of 43 days at this point. > it wasn't very stable at all (two crashes in one week) with 2.4.2. I'll be > building 2.4.4 something when I get back from ghana to the US, but I don't > want to reboot it onto a fresh kernel while I'm 11,000 miles away, serial > console notwithstanding. > > Overall I'm of the belief that reiserfs is robust enough for mainstream > use, and it's significantly faster than ext2 for the squid box, you do as > usal need to be a bit selective about what kernel you choose to run. Could you give un information on the hardware you're using for that proxy? Saludos... :-) -- El mejor sistema operativo es aquel que te da de comer. Cuida tu dieta. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martin Marques | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------