From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 21:01:30 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 21:01:20 -0400 Received: from fjordland.nl.linux.org ([131.211.28.101]:36357 "EHLO fjordland.nl.linux.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Tue, 15 May 2001 21:01:13 -0400 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Daniel Phillips To: Linus Torvalds , Neil Brown Subject: Re: LANANA: To Pending Device Number Registrants Date: Wed, 16 May 2001 03:00:54 +0200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.2] Cc: Jeff Garzik , Alan Cox , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , viro@math.psu.edu In-Reply-To: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051603005402.00406@starship> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 15 May 2001 17:34, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Tue, 15 May 2001, Neil Brown wrote: > > Ofcourse setting the "queue" function that __blk_get_queue call to > > do a lookup of the minor and choose an appropriate queue for the > > "real" device wont work as you need to munge bh->b_rdev too. > > What I would do is: > - remove b_rdev completely. :-) And b_rsector too? > [...] > - replace is with b_index > > Then, the "get_queue" functions basically end up doing the mapping of > > b_dev -> To clarify, will be b_index be in the buffer_head or not? -- Daniel