From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:45:14 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:45:03 -0400 Received: from pobox.sibyte.com ([208.12.96.20]:64777 "HELO pobox.sibyte.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id ; Fri, 18 May 2001 11:44:49 -0400 From: Justin Carlson Reply-To: carlson@sibyte.com Organization: Sibyte To: Jes Sorensen Subject: Re: CML2 design philosophy heads-up Date: Fri, 18 May 2001 08:37:30 -0700 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.29] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <20010505192731.A2374@thyrsus.com> <20010515173316.A8308@thyrsus.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01051808442800.27946@plugh.sibyte.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 18 May 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote: > Oh I don't, on the other hand I see you consistently ignoring the > needs and requirements of the users. So far I haven't heard a single > developer say something positive about CML2, the most positive I have > heard so far has been "whatever", "it's his choice", "I don't care", > "I want to hack". The majority are of the "NO!" and "you got to be > kiddin'". Perhaps your hearing has gone more than a bit selective. Please, allow me to be the first to get through: I think CML2 looks very interesting, and while it's not quite primetime yet, it's definitely a movement in the right direction. I'd even go sofar as to say I think CML2 is a GOOD THING. Or perhaps you have a more selective definition of developer? -Justin carlson@sibyte.com