public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Phillips <phillips@bonn-fries.net>
To: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman), Ben LaHaise <bcrl@redhat.com>
Cc: <torvalds@transmeta.com>, <viro@math.psu.edu>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace
Date: Sat, 19 May 2001 16:25:47 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01051916254708.00491@starship> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0105190138150.6079-100000@toomuch.toronto.redhat.com> <m14ruhin7d.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>
In-Reply-To: <m14ruhin7d.fsf@frodo.biederman.org>

On Saturday 19 May 2001 13:37, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> For creating partitions you might want to do:
> 	cat 1024 2048 > /dev/sda/newpartition

How about:

  # mkpart /dev/sda /dev/mypartition -o size=1024k,type=swap
  # ls /dev/mypartition
  base	size	device	type
  # cat /dev/mypartition/size
  1048576
  # cat /dev/mypartition/device
  /dev/sda
  # mke2fs /dev/mypartition

The information that was specified is persistent in /dev.  We can 
rearrange our physical devices any way we want without affecting
the name we chose in /dev.  When the kernel enumerates devices
at startup, our persistent information better match or we will have
to take some corrective action.

Generally, we shouldn't care which order the kernel enumerates
devices in or which device number gets assigned internally.  If we
did need to care, we'd just do:

  # echo 666 >/dev/mypartition/number

setting a persistent device minor number.  The major number is
inherited via the partition's /device property.

To set the minor number back to 'don't care':

  # rm /dev/mypartition/number

By taking the physical device off the top of the food chain we
gain the flexibility of being able to move the device from bus to 
bus for example, and only the partition's device property
changes, nothing in our fstab.  It's no great leap to set things
up so that not even the /device property would need to
change.

Note that we can have a heirarchy of partitions this way if 
we want to, since /dev/mypartition is just another block
device.

--
Daniel

  reply	other threads:[~2001-05-21  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 161+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-05-19  6:23 [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  6:57 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  7:04   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:23     ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19  8:30       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 10:13         ` Andrew Clausen
2001-05-19 14:02         ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code Alan Cox
2001-05-19 16:48           ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 17:45             ` Aaron Lehmann
2001-05-19 19:38               ` Erik Mouw
2001-05-19 20:53                 ` Steven Walter
2001-05-19 18:51           ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:18             ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:22               ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  2:34                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20  2:48                   ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20  3:26                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 10:23                       ` Russell King
2001-05-20 10:35                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 18:46                         ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 18:57                           ` Russell King
2001-05-20 19:10                             ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:42                               ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 20:07                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 20:33                                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 23:59                                   ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-21  0:36                                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:08                                       ` Paul Fulghum
2001-05-20 20:07                                 ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20 23:46                                 ` Ingo Molnar
2001-05-21  0:32                                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21  3:12                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 19:32                                     ` Kai Henningsen
2001-05-23  1:15                                     ` Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-20  2:36                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  2:51                   ` Richard Gooch
2001-05-20 21:13                     ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:20                       ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 20:41                         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:29                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 21:51                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 21:56                               ` Alan Cox
2001-05-21 22:10                                 ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-21 22:22                                   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-22  2:28                                     ` Paul Mackerras
2001-05-22 15:41                                     ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 13:33                                   ` Jan Harkes
2001-05-22 16:30                                     ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  0:22                               ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-22  0:57                                 ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  1:13                                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22  1:18                                     ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22  7:49                                       ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:31                                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:31                                           ` Alan Cox
2001-05-22 15:38                                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-22 15:42                                               ` Alan Cox
2001-05-20  2:31             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 16:57             ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-20 19:02               ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:11                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:18                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2001-05-20 19:24                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:34                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:27                   ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:33                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:38                       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20 19:57                 ` David Woodhouse
2001-05-21 13:57                 ` Ingo Oeser
2001-05-19  9:11     ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code inuserspace Andrew Morton
2001-05-19  9:20       ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  7:58   ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:10     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  8:16       ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-19  8:32         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19  9:42 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19  9:51 ` Christer Weinigel
2001-05-19 11:37 ` Eric W. Biederman
2001-05-19 14:25   ` Daniel Phillips [this message]
2001-05-21  8:14     ` Lars Marowsky-Bree
2001-05-22  9:07       ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:53 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-19 13:57 ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup) Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:10   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Abramo Bagnara
2001-05-19 15:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 16:01     ` Willem Konynenberg
2001-05-20 20:52       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-20 20:53       ` Pavel Machek
2001-05-19 18:13   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Linus Torvalds
2001-05-19 23:19     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 23:31       ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device " Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:32         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-19 23:39         ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 15:47           ` F_CTRLFD (was Re: Why side-effects on open(2) are evil.) Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 16:20             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20 19:01               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20 19:30                 ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-21 17:16           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 16:26             ` David Lang
2001-05-21 18:04               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-21 20:14             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 15:24               ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 16:51                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 17:49                   ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 20:22                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23  4:19                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-23  4:50                     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 13:50                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-23 15:58                       ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24  0:23                       ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24  7:47                         ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 14:39                           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-24 15:20                             ` CHR/BLK needed? was: Re: Why side-effects on open Marko Kreen
2001-05-24 17:12                             ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device Albert D. Cahalan
2001-05-24 17:25                         ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 20:59                           ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-24 21:26                             ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-25  1:03                               ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-25 11:00                             ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-26  3:07                               ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-26 22:36                                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 13:32                                   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-27 20:40                                     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-27 20:45                                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-27 21:50                                       ` Marko Kreen
2001-05-28  1:26                                       ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-29 10:54                                         ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-29 13:54                                           ` Horst von Brand
2001-05-19 23:52   ` Edgar Toernig
2001-05-20  0:18     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-20  0:32       ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-20  0:52         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20  1:03         ` Jeff Garzik
2001-05-20 19:41           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD Alan Cox
2001-05-21  9:45           ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH]device arguments from lookup) Andrew Clausen
2001-05-21 17:22           ` Oliver Xymoron
2001-05-22 18:53           ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-24  9:20             ` Malcolm Beattie
2001-05-24 19:15               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 18:41         ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 19:06           ` Linus Torvalds
2001-05-22 19:16             ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-22 20:10               ` Andreas Dilger
2001-05-22 20:59                 ` Peter J. Braam
2001-05-23  9:23                   ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-24 21:07                 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-24 22:00                   ` Hans Reiser
2001-05-25 10:56                     ` Daniel Phillips
2001-06-01  3:24                       ` [reiserfs-list] " Hans Reiser
2001-05-23  9:13               ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2001-05-20 20:23   ` Why side-effects on open(2) are evil. (was Re: [RFD w/info-PATCH] device " Pavel Machek
2001-05-21 20:38     ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 18:31 ` [RFD w/info-PATCH] device arguments from lookup, partion code in userspace Linus Torvalds
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-05-19 11:09 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-19 11:43 ` Andrew Morton
2001-05-19 12:00   ` Alexander Viro
2001-05-19 15:56     ` Ben LaHaise
2001-05-21 12:43 Andries.Brouwer
2001-05-21 16:08 ` Daniel Phillips
2001-05-22 18:45 Andries.Brouwer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01051916254708.00491@starship \
    --to=phillips@bonn-fries.net \
    --cc=bcrl@redhat.com \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
    --cc=viro@math.psu.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox